GOOD INSIGHT. THOUGH, WHAT I WAS GOING FOR WAS, THAT IN TIMES OF DESPERATION, PEOPLE ARE MORE LIKELY TO TAKE A QUICKER BUT HARMFUL PATH OVER THE SLOWER YET HARMLESS ONE. YOU DON'T HAVE TO BUY THE WEAPONS, BUT THEY MAKE IT QUICKER AND EASIER AT THE COST OF CAUSING DIRECT HARM TO HARVEY.
THE MORAL DILEMMA IS NOT "HOW QUICKLY CAN I REACH 25K WHILE CAUSING AS LITTLE HARM AS I CAN?", BUT "SHOULD I EXPEND MY ETHICS TO REACH 25K FASTER?"