Yay! I'm glad you enjoyed my game and thank you for being such a good sport about it. The core concept was birthed a year ago when I realized, or at least strongly believed, that my first entry in the series and to the Harold Jam as a whole, had gotten AI banned. It certainly stirred the hornet's nest. The basic idea was locked in from the beginning and the required theme and the story as it developed inspired the rest.
If memory recalls, you were fair and mature toward my last year's entry and I thank you for extending the same courtesy this time around. I had a blast making both.
| It's sooooo spiteful...
Oops. I tried my best to not attack you, personally, and go after the overall mentality behind banning AI from every game jam. I attempted to be as fair as I could within the concept of the story and the game world I've built.
| Comedy: I was laughing constantly
Excellent! The Harold's AI Odyssey games are comedy games first and foremost. I did attempt to add better gameplay in the sequel, see if my RPG / point-and-click hybrid experiment would be fun. Obviously, I also wanted to explore the central idea of what makes art art, and how technology shaped what art was throughout history since that was at the heart of its inspiration.
| Graphics: This is the part where I get to be spiteful!
Haha! This was your Kobayashi Maru. Well, the whole game was actually, not just the graphics. I was most curious to see how you, and the other two jam organizers, would take to this year's submission. Would you be fair and rate my game on it's merits or do what many others did last year and down vote it into oblivion? To be fair, it's your jam so you reserve the right to do whatever you like, but as I said earlier, I'm glad that you're being a good sport about it.
| Now then, let's address the elephant in the room.
Eh, to be honest, I'm not all that disgruntled about the AI ban. As I'm sure I made perfectly clear, I fully expected it. Heck, without it, I might not have even had an idea for this year.
My primary gripe is how purchased assets, RTP and all other tools that make developing a game easier are perfectly fine while AI generation will get you disqualified. I wouldn't expect bonus points for that which requires little effort on behalf of the dev but penalties and outright bans seem excessive, in my honest opinion.
But with that said, I feel like you picked up on the spirit of what I was going for. Truth be told, I'm not bitter or angry or spiteful. My game would have been far more annoying and low-effort had that truly been my motivation. Making games is a creative outlet for me and this was a unique moment in time where this story could be told and this game could be made. It was kind of a now or never situation, much like the first Harold's AI Odyssey.
So, thanks again and much love to the Harold Jam community. I hope there's no hard feelings from you or the others. Take care and I hope I will be able to participate next year as well.
P.S. My access to the Internet will be very limited for the next couple days. I'll be a little delayed in playing and rating the other entries.