Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

Ah, darn. I wonder what's up with that, then...

So, you can't fork with cards that don't have any card on top. For example, if what they had in the picture was a spades of some kind, they wouldn't have a valid move because each one's alone or part of the beginning fork. That's pretty much what happen to me. For them, the place where they originally forked from, probably the 2 of clubs or 13 of clubs, can't be forked with again as a new move because they're behind a fork currently. So neither of us have any valid moves in either example, forcing us in this position.

In the most recent versions I've made it so that you can fork with a stack that has a fork down the line if the move would just undo you picking up an entire fork branch; I'm wondering if there's a bug with that or if there might be a misunderstanding here.

(1 edit)

Sadly it didn't work for me and I am using 1.5.5, so it's likely a bug with that I'm afraid. Doesn't matter if you left or right click.

EDIT: It seems everything was fixed in 1.5.6!