Now that I know it isn’t Ai, I’m sorry. I never wanted to be on the accusatory end and I never thought I’d be unable to distinguish Ai versus human. I checked your other posts and channel, so my message was based on multiple reviews you made, not just a reply to me.
That wasn’t because of emoji or rubric, but the style of writing itself. Ai writes similar to how people write school essays to hit the word mark. I know my game and your review didn’t read genuine, it reads like trying to hit a word mark or a blog post you get paid per word. Ai writes exactly like that compared to how a real person would write a quick opinion on a 3 minute game, therefore the style is very similar to Ai. I used chat-GPT myself and because of this I was even more convinced I recognize the style.
All that work and effort, and that’s how you respond?
That what i felt when i read an Ai review. I would be ok with people not playing, but Ai felt like going extra mile avoiding real communication to me.
Kindly never darken my doorstep again.
Again, now that I see a comment that reads like a real person, I apologize for my accusation. But given all the reviews you’ve written, I am 100% sure I’m not the only person who thought it was written by Ai, they just didn’t mind enough to ask. This is something you should consider further, because you’re going to run into this accusation again due to your writing style. It is sad and as an artist I’ve seen similar situations, but it is the modern issue with Ai that any creative can run into, including me. If i was accused I would also be offended, of course.
Even if it wasn’t Ai, your review reads as a paid blog post, not a jam game player comment. I am thankful for your effort to give a detailed review and again I’m sorry that I didn’t make you feel valued. I said my honest opinion because I also expected an honest opinion and I felt like I didn’t get it. It was immature on my part to jump to conclusions, but I’m sure even you can see how your reviews can be mistaken for Ai.