I would like my money back because if it was a full game, it would not have had the "coming soon" on the different game modes, I am interested in paying for the version on steam with my $3 back but it is not fair that I bought the game and it wasn't fully released and now I'm expected to pay for another "full" version
Viewing post in That's not my Neighbor comments
They are man. You can defend it as much as you want. 90% of the assets used in the steam version are re-used from the itch.io. If not more. The game play is pretty much identical with simply the main differences being that you do certain actions in different places. Like asking questions. The biggest "game play" change is the ability to not let them in.
I get that you're passionate about defending the game. However plenty of games get face lifts during development. In fact it's quite literally one of the biggest stepping stones to developing a game. Sometimes you re-work art, mechanics, UI. That's just development. To say that warrants the title of being called a "brand new game" is insulting to any game developer who offers free update that actually reworks things for their game. Heck i'm a game-developer. I've worked in indie companies where our early version of the game looks and plays nothing like later versions of the game. We didn't charge people again for our game though.
It's simply not enough to be called a new game.
I personally don't agree, but to each their own opinion. Thank you for not just bashing my opinion like most of the comments here. Taking the last of us remake for example. Same game, had to buy it again. They overhauled the graphics and mechanics, but the story stayed the same. The remake for that's not my neighbor did the same thing. Overhauled the mechanics, added some new ones, a new game category to remake the entire apartment with custom tenants. I'd call it a remake and not a update.