Liking furries is WAY different from liking lolies because furries are 1. above the age of 18 2. furries are intelligent compared to irl animals 3. furries (as in not fursuits) are not alive irl. however for lolis they are 1. Below the age of 18 which is a illegal and is a child period 2. a childs brain is not developed to make decisions like consent. 3. lolis are just children idc if they are "10000 years old" and fictional if it walks talks and looks like a child that is a child and if you like that you are a pedophile and thats it. Just because something is fiction does not mean you dont like the real thing people like romance anime cus they like romance someone could like a baseball anime cus they like baseball. and to answer your question again is that lolies are an adaptation of children with no change and furries are a combination of humans and animals with change to keep the intellect of humans and their bipedalism with some of the physical attributes of animals like a snout, fur, whiskers, claws, ect. furries are WAY different from each other in behavior and depiction, but lolies are all CHILDREN even if it was stated that they are older than 18 if it acts like and looks like a child THATS A CHILD and if you like lolies then you like irl children. if you like furries then you (hopefully) DONT like irl animals because furries are uniqe from animals while lolies are NOT unique from children.
like let me try to make this clear to you...
yes some furry stuff is humanoid animals, but I'm assuming you f****** realize that is there is art of full-on animals having sex with humans? right??? and if you say "oh but they're all 18" or whatever f*** excuse you want to say.
do you know there's something called ""cubs""? because I do, so shut your mouth.
do you understand that not everyone who likes furries likes feral and feral is not OK and feral is small and in EVERY genre there is stuff that people dont like about it and even the furries DONT like feral because most of the time it involves REAL animals which is ZOOPHILA that ALL of the furry community hate but for lolies there are ONLY children not like furries where there is a bad side with ferals and a acceptable good side with humanoids.
oh my god you even more retarded.
so in your opinion only some fictional stuff is allowed? like I don't f****** care about your opinion.
because you're just wrong and even if you were right? I would still not care because in my country at least it is not the case.
in my country anything that doesn't hurt anyone is allowed, so too bad.
I'm happy my country is not ruled by f****** idiots like you
there IS art of animals having sex with humans and that is not OK im not going to try and argue that zoophilia is ok because its not and thats not what liking a furry is, BUT liking a loli IS pedophila because that IS a child. furries are NOT irl, unable to consent, feral animals. but i can tell YOU that lolies are unable to consent, IRL, and LITTERAL CHILDREN.
they are f****** animals you idiot I don't care if they can stand on two feet and speak if a furry actually existed in reality they would be a animal, making it bestiality if a human had sex with them or sexually attraction to them.
if you are going to use the logic of "whatever you like in fiction you have to like in reality" then by definition you are a filthy Zoophilia do not try to grandstand.
I'm well aware that most people look at beastiality and say "yeah that's bad but it's not as bad as pedophilia" but that is irrelevant, either both of them are bad even if their fictional or they are both okay if their fictional.
you cannot choose one is ""Bad"" and the other is not, because I can tell you this, both furry and loli would be illegal if either one was illegal, so shut your f****** mouth unless you want your dog f****** PORN taking away from you.
do you understand what I'm saying to you?
it's fine that you think "oh this thing is bad, but my thing is not bad" but then you have to live with that my thing has to be allowed to exist otherwise your thing will also be taken away.
because I can guarantee you, if for example loli art was illegal in my country? I would then immediately start billing for furry art and pornography to be illegal as well.
your thing IS bad though because thats children. Furries are not feral, unintelligent animals, furries have the ability to consent furries are above the age of 18 furries are NOT irl animals. Also you cant judge the entirety of furries becuase of feral and cubs because that is not what furries is about just like anything else BUT you CAN judge lolies because their WHOLE community is about pedophila because thats what a loli IS.
and lolis are not real life children! you! f******! moron!!! let me give you a good example of a well-known loli that everyone love
gawr gura.
she is literally for example the biggest vtuber, are you calling all her followers, all the people who have subscribed to her and watch her pedophiles?
if you say yes? then this discussion and your defense has completely Fallen apart.
like it was already crumbling because you have no sense of reality but depending on your response to this specific? will solicify how retarded you Are, Forever.
If you don't hurt a child in real life but you like Loli or furry even though they are animals it doesn't matter, that's what it exists for, to fulfill a fantasy that you shouldn't do in real life,It's like video games, everyone likes GTA, running over pedestrians and making a mess with the police. Because it's something we can't do in real life and we shouldn't do it either.That's what I mean, if you like something fictional, I don't consider you a pedophile, because for that you would have to have something real first. And if you don't harm any living being, it's not bad.
see I think the same thing.
there's a difference between loli and real life children.
because one is fictional and the other one is not and the same goes for furry stuff, one is clearly fictional and the other one is a real life animal.
but many people as you can see above☝🏼 are not able to understand that to a scary degree.
Personally, I wouldn't compare Lolicon/Shotcon or any fictional minor as the same weight as real CP.
That being said, it's still pretty fucking disgusting if you consume/make fictional Zoophilia, Lolicon/Shotacon/minor, or hell, even throw in necrophilia into the mix while we're at it. Even honest to god you aren't a zoophile, pedophile, or a necrophile deep down inside while consuming/making this kind content, shit is still gross as fuck at the end of the day and these kinds of content shouldn't be normalized.
With anthro Furries, they're humanoid. Aliens, Robots, Orcs, Goblins, Mermaid, Angels, Demons, Monster, Planes, and whatever else anthrofied/humanoid is also fine in NSFW works. What do they have in common? For the most part an adult human anatomy with slight differences. That I can see the appeal. Hey, people love tits, ass, dick, pussy, and sex so I understand why people like it.
What I don't understand (nor want to honestly) why a child, animal or insect, or fucking a dead body for pornographic reasons is appealing.
Not all fantasies are created equal. Not all fiction is created equal.
That fact you do weird shit, people will think you're weird for it, and people have the right to think you're weird for it.
Well thank you! I'm happy to hear that you found this insightful. :]
But yeah, seeing these kinds of discussions can be pretty annoying. Out of all those -phillias mentioned, Lolicons/Shotacons are the most obnoxious about these things and pretty parasitic with their arguments. They latch to violence in fictional media (extremely tunnel visioned about videos games, but don't mention other media such as movies, books, art, etc.) and you have this one trying to drag anthropomorphic furries down to the same level as their thing. The way I see it, their arguments never can stand on their own.
One of things that still blows my mind is that how nobody points out that they're wanting to normalize pornographic content of minors, potentially letting other crazy shit being normalized too, and ask these people that why is doing that a good thing? Why we even need to do such a thing in the first place?
Not only that, but they try to twist it around and make it that other people are weird for it for criticizing/getting angry about said content. The same people that get their dick or pussy wet and get off with the content consisting of fictional minors while acting it's perfectly fine instead of seeing it as a red flag.