Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+6)(-3)

your thing IS bad though because thats children. Furries are not feral, unintelligent animals, furries have the ability to consent furries are above the age of 18 furries are NOT irl animals. Also you cant judge the entirety of furries becuase of feral and cubs because that is not what furries is about just like anything else BUT you CAN judge lolies because their WHOLE community is about pedophila because thats what a loli IS.

(+2)(-5)

and lolis are not real life children! you! f******! moron!!! let me give you a good example of a well-known loli that everyone love

gawr gura.

she is literally for example the biggest vtuber, are you calling all her followers, all the people who have subscribed to her and watch her pedophiles? 

if you say yes? then this discussion and your defense has completely Fallen apart.

like it was already crumbling because you have no sense of reality but depending on your response to this specific? will solicify how retarded you Are, Forever.

(1 edit) (+2)(-6)

and also I am not even gonna bother reading anything else you write because you have no writing skills.

you just make a giant blob of words and terrible spelling and I'm not even a native English speaker and dyslexic and I'm able to write.

(+1)(-1)

If you don't hurt a child in real life but you like Loli or furry even though they are animals it doesn't matter, that's what it exists for, to fulfill a fantasy that you shouldn't do in real life,It's like video games, everyone likes GTA, running over pedestrians and making a mess with the police. Because it's something we can't do in real life and we shouldn't do it either.That's what I mean, if you like something fictional, I don't consider you a pedophile, because for that you would have to have something real first. And if you don't harm any living being, it's not bad. 

(+1)(-1)

see I think the same thing.

there's a difference between loli and real life children.

because one is fictional and the other one is not and the same goes for furry stuff, one is clearly fictional and the other one is a real life animal.

but many people as you can see above☝🏼 are not able to understand that to a scary degree.

Personally, I wouldn't compare Lolicon/Shotcon or any fictional minor as the same weight as real CP.

That being said, it's still pretty fucking disgusting if you consume/make fictional Zoophilia, Lolicon/Shotacon/minor, or hell, even throw in necrophilia into the mix while we're at it. Even honest to god you aren't a zoophile, pedophile, or a necrophile deep down inside while consuming/making this kind content, shit is still gross as fuck at the end of the day and these kinds of content shouldn't be normalized.

With anthro Furries, they're humanoid. Aliens, Robots, Orcs, Goblins, Mermaid, Angels, Demons, Monster, Planes, and whatever else anthrofied/humanoid is also fine in NSFW works. What do they have in common? For the most part an adult human anatomy with slight differences. That I can see the appeal. Hey, people love tits, ass, dick, pussy, and sex so I understand why people like it.

What I don't understand (nor want to honestly) why a child, animal or insect, or fucking a dead body for pornographic reasons is appealing.

Not all fantasies are created equal. Not all fiction is created equal.

That fact you do weird shit, people will think you're weird for it, and people have the right to think you're weird for it.

(+2)

Well said, I agree with you on that and am glad someone is able to put this into the words most people seem to struggle to. Reading the comments, I was starting to get annoyed how ignorant people can be, so thank you.

(1 edit)

Well thank you! I'm happy to hear that you found this insightful. :]

But yeah, seeing these kinds of discussions can be pretty annoying. Out of all those -phillias mentioned, Lolicons/Shotacons are the most obnoxious about these things and pretty parasitic with their arguments. They latch to violence in fictional media (extremely tunnel visioned about videos games, but don't mention other media such as movies, books, art, etc.) and you have this one trying to drag anthropomorphic furries down to the same level as their thing. The way I see it, their arguments never can stand on their own.

One of things that still blows my mind is that how nobody points out that they're wanting to normalize pornographic content of minors, potentially letting other crazy shit being normalized too, and ask these people that why is doing that a good thing? Why we even need to do such a thing in the first place?

Not only that, but they try to twist it around and make it that other people are weird for it for criticizing/getting angry about said content. The same people that get their dick or pussy wet and get off with the content consisting of fictional minors while acting it's perfectly fine instead of seeing it as a red flag.