Ok I made the changes you told me and added a keyDown event that increase the p2size and that's the result.
The other view appear from the top right (but I think is because the 2nd player was in that position) in a oval way while instead, I would like it in a circular way and in a fixed position, top right is ok to me.
Is there any chance to have even a black outline of the circular view?
Your first guess is correct, the view is still centered around the 2nd player's relative position, but you can just explicitly change that (since you're not going to actually have a second player) to get the cut-in wherever you want.
The black outline is pretty simple, check if the distance is "close to the max value" (e.g. < 0.001 difference, change to a larger/smaller value to change thickness) and if so, set the gl_FragColor to black rather than any of the sampled colors.
Despite the simple idea it's a bit of a mess but I'm thinking two changes will be enough:
#1, the distance check
if(dist < vsize[c]){
bestdist = dist;
bestid = c;
if(dist > vsize[c] - 0.0001){ //This part is new
bestid = 9;
}
}
#2, at the end
if(bestid < 9){
gl_FragColor = sampcol[bestid];
}
else{
gl_FragColor = vec4(0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0);
}
Making it circular gets more complicated but I think you can "cheat" a bit to simplify this - instead of taking the distance between the actual pixels when doing the distance check, make two new vec2 variables which are copies of the player position / current fragment position but you multiply the x coordinate by 9.0/16.0 (the inverse of the aspect ratio).
So something like this might be enough, just replacing the dist check:
dist = distance(screenpos[c].xy*vec2(9.0/16.0, 1.0),v_vTexcoord*vec2(9.0/16.0, 1.0));
Thank you for your support! I made the changes you told me but the result seems strange.
The other view is still an oval, instead I think is more oval than before.
The black outline is present but is too much thin.
I'm not clear on how to keep the other camera's appearance fixed at the top right.
The oval camera appearance is not perfectly centered on player 2.
Thank you so much for the support!
Oh right, multiplying by a smaller value makes distances shorter than they actually are - my bad, the 9/16 factor should probably go for the y value instead of the x value.
To make the outline thicker just increase the "0.0001" used for that comparison, 0.001 is probably too thick so maybe 0.0005 will look better? (If you have a specific pixel width you want, just divide that with the screen width to get the value to use here)
As you can see for both of these, I don't really know everything and a lot of this is trial and error :P You kinda can't get away from it with shaders, they're very visual compared to regular game logic code...
The "player 2 position" used in the shader is set in the control object's Post Draw event, it's the third and fourth row of the pos array and they're percentages (since they're coordinates in screen space). So for instance if you always want the pop-in in the top right corner, you could change it to something like this:
var pos = [
global.voron_screenpos_x[0],
global.voron_screenpos_y[0],
0.85,
0.15,
global.voron_screenpos_x[2],
global.voron_screenpos_y[2],
global.voron_screenpos_x[3],
global.voron_screenpos_y[3]
];
Thank you a lot for the support I will try as soon as possible!
I really appreciate your kindness!
I think the reason the P2 camera isn't centered is because the view isn't allowed to go outside the level and it's always 1 screen big, so when forcing it to focus on a given position without taking the relative positions into account you can end up with a suboptimal view. It's easy to tweak at least, it's the lines near the bottom of obj_viewcontrol's End Step event.
global.voron_tlc_x[c] = clamp(global.voron_worldpos_x[c] - VIEW_W*xf,0,room_width - VIEW_W) global.voron_tlc_y[c] = clamp(global.voron_worldpos_y[c] - VIEW_H*yf,0,room_height - VIEW_H)
Just removing the clamping to let the view poke outside the room might help (though we don't wanna do that for the main view following the player)
if(c > 0){
global.voron_tlc_x[c] = global.voron_worldpos_x[c] - VIEW_W*xf
global.voron_tlc_y[c] = global.voron_worldpos_y[c] - VIEW_H*yf
}
else{
global.voron_tlc_x[c] = clamp(global.voron_worldpos_x[c] - VIEW_W*xf,0,room_width - VIEW_W)
global.voron_tlc_y[c] = clamp(global.voron_worldpos_y[c] - VIEW_H*yf,0,room_height - VIEW_H)
}
You might need to add a factor adjusting the view position based on where you have the pop-in (since the popin isn't centered in the view, the view should be offset to make sure the bit you cut out is actually centered) but I'm unsure what direction and magnitude will be correct here so I'd just recommend you to play around with the numbers until you get it right - but my guess is subtracting VIEW_W*0.425 from the x coordinate and VIEW_H*0.075 from the y coordinate (half of the 0.85, 0.15 coordinates we use for the center).
To import this to an existing project it should be enough to import obj_viewcontrol, sh_voronoimerge, and the voron_init, voron_player_get_id scripts (either right click empty space in the asset browser and pick Add Existing, or open the stuff in an external editor and copypaste the code into fresh objects created in your new project - I prefer the latter method for more control but the former is probably the most convenient), the init script has a pragma that makes it automatically be ran when the game loads so you don't need to manually set it up.
Next have an object named "parent_player" (which your player objects and goal objects inherits from), and give your player a variable player_id which is 0 for player 1 while the goal also has the same variable but it's 1 (this is what the control object uses to figure out where to put the views).
Then just place an obj_viewcontrol in the room (or better yet, have the player create one in its Room Start / Create event so you don't need to manually place one in every level) and it should hopefully handle everything on its own from there.
Thank you! So with these changes is still weird, if I move the player_1 the position of the second view that pop in remain change, or better it move based on player_1 moves, is a slow movement but it does.
I tryed to play with values but even removing the clamp the pop in view still work off-centered.
What changes did you add more exactly? Only removing the clamp or also hardcoding the center position + adding the new adjustment factors?
OK, I think I get what's happening now - since you assume manual control of the view the batching system gets in the way. I fiddled around with it and got better results after the following changes:
Now there's no batching, and the average position (used to center the main view) only takes player 1's position into account. The only drawback is that the pop-in assumes player 2 is in the center of the entire screen, but you can solve that by just pushing the view around with some constant factors based on screen size.
