Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
Tags
(+5)(-1)

From what I played there were multiple opportunities to rebuff or criticize the guys. 

With Ian specifically I remember you can be bored of his long-windedness, openly suspicious that he's doing so on purpose, or angry because you're sure he's doing it on purpose. Or civil, because maybe he's actually going somewhere with his rambling.
I also remember having the choice to not humor most of the advances because I already had a guy in mind. And apparently we'll be getting more ways to react.

I think the love trope works well due to it preventing them from swarming her like a bunch of piranhas. Because they tried exactly that. And now that she's aware just want something from her, it's no longer viable to just be the one that flatters her the most.

If it were something tangible like her "eat her heart" or "take her virginity" then I wouldn't put it past them to turn into absolute animals to be the one that gets it from her whether she consents or not.
Even if it were something intangible like "she knows where (special item) is" or "she can sense the presence of Altids" then they could easily threaten to throw her to the wolves, starve her, or harm her if she doesn't help.

Getting her to genuinely love them is the one thing they can't force, and their shortcut of tricking her into falling in love is gone now that Vincent spilled the beans.

I'd say that the "none of them would even look at her" comment sounded believable from Vincent at the time BECAUSE of how inappropriate and suspiciously forward they were all being. It's at least one of the only things she's been hearing that makes the most sense, since Ian had been making absolutely none. It can't be chalked up as a quansie thing either, since Cass wasn't acting a fool. Nor Ian or Vincent.

(+3)

Indeed. Which seems weirder still when she is suddenly like "oml they're all so right." out of no where. You do have options not to humour their advances, but she still seems to randomly ogle them even if you choose to shut them down. It all seems weird to me, like it really just doesn't flow and the main character goes back and forth ALOT, in the absence of options, perhaps. Which I AM hoping that this is something that does get fixed when more options are added, but it is something that really needs to change for the sake of character consistency.

As I've said before, the love trope just isn't necessary. They have these characters attempting to justify and explain the science of this world which is what I love so much about the world building they've done(confusing plot aside). The world seems cool and they're implementing interesting rules for their world in which I do not believe an ability activated by "love" just doesn't seem to fit. They could be wrong, there is obviously a lot they don't know, yes and yet that seems to me like all the more reason that them knowing something so obscure as "love is the key to this ability" seems so out of place. The ability itself just doesn't really seem to NEED that. A fear response even would honestly work better or something at least a little more tangible, maybe not even a choice at all where the ability responds on it's own. The fact that only one person can benefit from the ability SHOULD be enough for them to want to get her attention, not necessary "love" but proximity and an attempt to win her affection so she will either CHOOSE to spend more time with them and help them or they will benefit by mere proximity and familiarity. I don't see how it would be possible to really gauge love especially in a life or death situation where it would matter. Harming and starving and so on would work no matter what, if I were honest. They can hold her captive and torture her and hope she developed Stockholm syndrome if they were really going to go all out. It's simply too hard a thing to keep track of, people experience things much too differently even for this to work out. It just doesn't fit for me.

And I absolutely agree that she would probably definitely be swayed by the comment. But she monologues it with such finality, as if she has some reason to believe anything the dude that kidnapped her says. "He's right." Not "He may be right.", "he's probably right.", "Is that true?". It's "Vincent is mean, but he's honest." That seems like the biggest fricken leap. He's done nothing but say hurtful things on purpose, regardless of their relevance or accuracy, so the massive jump to "He's right. Vincent is mean but he's honest." is jarring. She could at least have some doubt, no the guys don't have a genuine interest in her, but that doesn't mean he is right or honest. Her abilities are entirely foreign to her, so taking his revelation as truth and honesty just because some dudes she doesn't know are stripping in front of her doesn't seem like something she'd be doing if you've previously played a skeptical MC especially. And that she sees him as honest and not trying to throw the others under the bus to win her favour with a different, equally deceptive tactic is just a little frustrating. WHY would she trust him at all?

(1 edit) (+4)(-3)

I'm not reading this wall LOL

Take a nap.

Edit: I've said my piece and know that this will end up going in circles. You're way too proud of your toxicity to hold an actual discussion.

(+3)(-3)

Sure, well it's there anyways. =] You read the first wall and decided to reply but now you're too good for me agreeing with you. God forbid.

(+3)(-2)

Didn't get that nap in eh? Still cranky.