13 entries were submitted between 2022-05-12 22:00:00 and 2022-05-31 22:00:00. 38 ratings were given to 13 entries (100.0%) between 2022-05-31 22:00:00 and 2022-06-07 22:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 2.9 and the median was 3.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Most Compelling Narrative | #1 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Most Innovative Use of Ludonarrative | #1 | 3.250 | 3.250 |
| Most Compelling Character | #1 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Overall | #1 | 3.313 | 3.313 |
| Most "Complete" Project | #2 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Most Compelling Narrative | #2 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Most "Complete" Project | #5 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Overall | #5 | 2.667 | 2.667 |
| Most Compelling Character | #7 | 2.333 | 2.333 |
| Most Innovative Use of Ludonarrative | #11 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Most Compelling Character | #1 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Most Compelling Narrative | #2 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Overall | #2 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Most Innovative Use of Ludonarrative | #5 | 2.667 | 2.667 |
| Most "Complete" Project | #5 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Overall | #2 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Most Innovative Use of Ludonarrative | #2 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Most "Complete" Project | #4 | 3.200 | 3.200 |
| Most Compelling Narrative | #4 | 3.200 | 3.200 |
| Most Compelling Character | #5 | 2.600 | 2.600 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Most "Complete" Project | #3 | 3.250 | 3.250 |
| Most Innovative Use of Ludonarrative | #4 | 2.750 | 2.750 |
| Most Compelling Narrative | #5 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Overall | #7 | 2.625 | 2.625 |
| Most Compelling Character | #11 | 1.500 | 1.500 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Most "Complete" Project | #1 | 3.674 | 4.500 |
| Most Innovative Use of Ludonarrative | #3 | 2.858 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #4 | 2.960 | 3.625 |
| Most Compelling Character | #6 | 2.449 | 3.000 |
| Most Compelling Narrative | #6 | 2.858 | 3.500 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Most Compelling Character | #1 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Most Innovative Use of Ludonarrative | #5 | 2.667 | 2.667 |
| Overall | #6 | 2.667 | 2.667 |
| Most Compelling Narrative | #7 | 2.667 | 2.667 |
| Most "Complete" Project | #8 | 2.333 | 2.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Most Compelling Narrative | #8 | 2.309 | 4.000 |
| Most Innovative Use of Ludonarrative | #8 | 2.309 | 4.000 |
| Most "Complete" Project | #10 | 1.732 | 3.000 |
| Overall | #11 | 1.876 | 3.250 |
| Most Compelling Character | #12 | 1.155 | 2.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Most "Complete" Project | #7 | 2.800 | 2.800 |
| Most Innovative Use of Ludonarrative | #7 | 2.600 | 2.600 |
| Overall | #8 | 2.400 | 2.400 |
| Most Compelling Character | #9 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
| Most Compelling Narrative | #9 | 2.200 | 2.200 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Most Compelling Character | #7 | 2.333 | 2.333 |
| Most "Complete" Project | #9 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
| Overall | #9 | 2.083 | 2.083 |
| Most Compelling Narrative | #10 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
| Most Innovative Use of Ludonarrative | #11 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Most Compelling Character | #4 | 2.858 | 3.500 |
| Most Innovative Use of Ludonarrative | #9 | 2.041 | 2.500 |
| Overall | #10 | 1.939 | 2.375 |
| Most Compelling Narrative | #11 | 1.633 | 2.000 |
| Most "Complete" Project | #12 | 1.225 | 1.500 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Most Innovative Use of Ludonarrative | #9 | 2.041 | 2.500 |
| Most Compelling Character | #10 | 1.633 | 2.000 |
| Most "Complete" Project | #11 | 1.633 | 2.000 |
| Most Compelling Narrative | #11 | 1.633 | 2.000 |
| Overall | #12 | 1.735 | 2.125 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Most Compelling Narrative | #13 | 0.577 | 1.000 |
| Most "Complete" Project | #13 | 0.577 | 1.000 |
| Most Compelling Character | #13 | 0.577 | 1.000 |
| Most Innovative Use of Ludonarrative | #13 | 0.577 | 1.000 |
| Overall | #13 | 0.577 | 1.000 |
