As someone who works devops in a large company, this implementation of the modifier gave me an elevated heart rate 😅.

But I liked it as a clicker game with a commentary on development, and I found the names of the upgrades hilarious! And jesus christ the MEETINGS, its only slightly exaggerated in my experience. Though I admit I do wonder how many people didn't get the joke.

I do wish there was an ending for the game though, like you release the game and it just shows a screen of horrible reviews and you get fired.

Overall though this wasn't a bad clicker game, nice work!

I feel personally called out.

Pretty fun, though at one point we were just unable to buy any upgrades in spite of having more than enough bugs? Didn’t quite understand that system. Game obviously got super laggy after a while, but I thought that was pretty funny. The flashy “in meeting” screens were a little hard on the eyes, but still okay.

Nice little idle game (or parody thereof I guess), well done!

The warning at the beginning is something. It set the tone, but it did not prepare me for what was coming.

You patch one bug, now you have two bugs... Interrupted by meetings, strategies that sorta work but don't... yeah. I found the meta-humour hilarious, and I think this is going to appeal to a lot of devs while maybe being lost on others.

If there's one thing that's missing, it's a clear scoring mechanism or defined end to the game. I ended up having a massive pile of bugs overflowing over the top of the screen, no available modifiers left, numbers going through the roof and the "in meeting" flashing on and off several times a second (this should probably be a seizure warning). That seemed to be an end state, but there wasn't an explicit game over.

It was pretty funny to see the bugs literally overflow over the top of the screen though.