226 entries were submitted between 2025-07-01 16:00:00 and 2025-08-01 03:59:59. 4,464 ratings were given to 227 entries (100.0%) between 2025-08-01 03:59:59 and 2025-08-15 16:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.8 and the median was 15.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #1 | 4.789 | 4.789 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #40 | 4.395 | 4.395 |
| Overall | #41 | 4.174 | 4.174 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #47 | 4.132 | 4.132 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #87 | 3.658 | 3.658 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #87 | 3.895 | 3.895 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Overall | #1 | 4.540 | 4.540 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #2 | 4.750 | 4.750 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #7 | 4.775 | 4.775 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #9 | 4.425 | 4.425 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #11 | 4.275 | 4.275 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #17 | 4.475 | 4.475 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #3 | 4.697 | 4.697 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #37 | 4.030 | 4.030 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #39 | 4.182 | 4.182 |
| Overall | #42 | 4.170 | 4.170 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #85 | 4.030 | 4.030 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #86 | 3.909 | 3.909 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #4 | 4.688 | 4.688 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #14 | 4.500 | 4.500 |
| Overall | #22 | 4.350 | 4.350 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #22 | 4.563 | 4.563 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #48 | 4.125 | 4.125 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #53 | 3.875 | 3.875 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #5 | 4.667 | 4.667 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #61 | 3.800 | 3.800 |
| Overall | #63 | 4.053 | 4.053 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #80 | 3.933 | 3.933 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #87 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #90 | 3.867 | 3.867 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #6 | 4.627 | 4.627 |
| Overall | #13 | 4.416 | 4.416 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #15 | 4.490 | 4.490 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #19 | 4.627 | 4.627 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #25 | 4.314 | 4.314 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #38 | 4.020 | 4.020 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #7 | 4.625 | 4.625 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #7 | 4.438 | 4.438 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #31 | 4.313 | 4.313 |
| Overall | #35 | 4.213 | 4.213 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #68 | 3.750 | 3.750 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #97 | 3.938 | 3.938 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Overall | #2 | 4.524 | 4.524 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #4 | 4.524 | 4.524 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #7 | 4.286 | 4.286 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #8 | 4.619 | 4.619 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #13 | 4.524 | 4.524 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #16 | 4.667 | 4.667 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #9 | 4.606 | 4.606 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #11 | 4.394 | 4.394 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #12 | 4.273 | 4.273 |
| Overall | #18 | 4.370 | 4.370 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #33 | 4.303 | 4.303 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #54 | 4.273 | 4.273 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #10 | 4.600 | 4.600 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #61 | 4.200 | 4.200 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #61 | 3.800 | 3.800 |
| Overall | #74 | 3.987 | 3.987 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #107 | 3.733 | 3.733 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #125 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #5 | 4.600 | 4.600 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #10 | 4.600 | 4.600 |
| Overall | #16 | 4.387 | 4.387 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #22 | 4.333 | 4.333 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #26 | 4.133 | 4.133 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #56 | 4.267 | 4.267 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #12 | 4.591 | 4.591 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #43 | 4.364 | 4.364 |
| Overall | #45 | 4.164 | 4.164 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #51 | 4.091 | 4.091 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #59 | 4.136 | 4.136 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #91 | 3.636 | 3.636 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #13 | 4.586 | 4.586 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #14 | 4.379 | 4.379 |
| Overall | #24 | 4.331 | 4.331 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #27 | 4.345 | 4.345 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #32 | 4.448 | 4.448 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #49 | 3.897 | 3.897 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #14 | 4.565 | 4.565 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #91 | 3.870 | 3.870 |
| Overall | #121 | 3.643 | 3.643 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #127 | 3.348 | 3.348 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #144 | 3.435 | 3.435 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #169 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #6 | 4.441 | 4.441 |
| Overall | #9 | 4.441 | 4.441 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #13 | 4.265 | 4.265 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #15 | 4.559 | 4.559 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #23 | 4.559 | 4.559 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #23 | 4.382 | 4.382 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #5 | 4.778 | 4.778 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #9 | 4.278 | 4.278 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #16 | 4.556 | 4.556 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #19 | 4.361 | 4.361 |
| Overall | #21 | 4.361 | 4.361 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #93 | 3.833 | 3.833 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #2 | 4.623 | 4.786 |
| Overall | #7 | 4.444 | 4.600 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #16 | 4.485 | 4.643 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #17 | 4.554 | 4.714 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #25 | 4.140 | 4.286 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #37 | 4.416 | 4.571 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #18 | 4.549 | 4.549 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #35 | 4.039 | 4.039 |
| Overall | #53 | 4.114 | 4.114 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #55 | 4.196 | 4.196 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #63 | 4.020 | 4.020 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #114 | 3.765 | 3.765 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #11 | 4.714 | 4.714 |
| Overall | #17 | 4.371 | 4.371 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #19 | 4.536 | 4.536 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #21 | 4.179 | 4.179 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #25 | 4.357 | 4.357 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #55 | 4.071 | 4.071 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #20 | 4.534 | 4.534 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #27 | 4.517 | 4.517 |
| Overall | #40 | 4.186 | 4.186 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #55 | 3.845 | 3.845 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #60 | 4.052 | 4.052 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #77 | 3.983 | 3.983 |
