226 entries were submitted between 2025-07-01 16:00:00 and 2025-08-01 03:59:59. 4,464 ratings were given to 227 entries (100.0%) between 2025-08-01 03:59:59 and 2025-08-15 16:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.8 and the median was 15.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #1 | 4.591 | 4.591 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #8 | 4.773 | 4.773 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #11 | 4.545 | 4.545 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #18 | 4.364 | 4.364 |
| Overall | #20 | 4.364 | 4.364 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #173 | 3.545 | 3.545 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #2 | 4.556 | 4.556 |
| Overall | #5 | 4.489 | 4.489 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #5 | 4.778 | 4.778 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #12 | 4.389 | 4.389 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #32 | 4.444 | 4.444 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #42 | 4.278 | 4.278 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #3 | 4.353 | 4.353 |
| Overall | #12 | 4.424 | 4.424 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #13 | 4.382 | 4.382 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #15 | 4.676 | 4.676 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #21 | 4.441 | 4.441 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #60 | 4.265 | 4.265 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #1 | 4.833 | 4.833 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #1 | 4.778 | 4.778 |
| Overall | #3 | 4.522 | 4.522 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #4 | 4.333 | 4.333 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #20 | 4.611 | 4.611 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #94 | 4.056 | 4.056 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #4 | 4.333 | 4.333 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #7 | 4.583 | 4.583 |
| Overall | #27 | 4.283 | 4.283 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #52 | 4.292 | 4.292 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #63 | 4.250 | 4.250 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #76 | 3.958 | 3.958 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #6 | 4.316 | 4.316 |
| Overall | #11 | 4.432 | 4.432 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #14 | 4.684 | 4.684 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #15 | 4.368 | 4.368 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #21 | 4.526 | 4.526 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #46 | 4.263 | 4.263 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Overall | #2 | 4.524 | 4.524 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #4 | 4.524 | 4.524 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #7 | 4.286 | 4.286 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #8 | 4.619 | 4.619 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #13 | 4.524 | 4.524 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #16 | 4.667 | 4.667 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #8 | 4.278 | 4.429 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #41 | 4.278 | 4.429 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #57 | 4.071 | 4.214 |
| Overall | #59 | 4.071 | 4.214 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #110 | 3.795 | 3.929 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #115 | 3.933 | 4.071 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #5 | 4.778 | 4.778 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #9 | 4.278 | 4.278 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #16 | 4.556 | 4.556 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #19 | 4.361 | 4.361 |
| Overall | #21 | 4.361 | 4.361 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #93 | 3.833 | 3.833 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #3 | 4.552 | 4.552 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #6 | 4.586 | 4.586 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #10 | 4.276 | 4.276 |
| Overall | #10 | 4.434 | 4.434 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #38 | 4.414 | 4.414 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #45 | 4.345 | 4.345 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Overall | #1 | 4.540 | 4.540 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #2 | 4.750 | 4.750 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #7 | 4.775 | 4.775 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #9 | 4.425 | 4.425 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #11 | 4.275 | 4.275 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #17 | 4.475 | 4.475 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #9 | 4.606 | 4.606 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #11 | 4.394 | 4.394 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #12 | 4.273 | 4.273 |
| Overall | #18 | 4.370 | 4.370 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #33 | 4.303 | 4.303 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #54 | 4.273 | 4.273 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #6 | 4.441 | 4.441 |
| Overall | #9 | 4.441 | 4.441 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #13 | 4.265 | 4.265 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #15 | 4.559 | 4.559 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #23 | 4.559 | 4.559 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #23 | 4.382 | 4.382 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #3 | 4.887 | 4.887 |
| Overall | #6 | 4.449 | 4.449 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #9 | 4.566 | 4.566 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #10 | 4.415 | 4.415 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #14 | 4.264 | 4.264 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #85 | 4.113 | 4.113 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #15 | 4.256 | 4.256 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #28 | 4.279 | 4.279 |
| Overall | #57 | 4.084 | 4.084 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #64 | 4.093 | 4.093 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #100 | 3.930 | 3.930 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #131 | 3.860 | 3.860 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #3 | 4.684 | 4.684 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #4 | 4.789 | 4.789 |
| Overall | #8 | 4.442 | 4.442 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #15 | 4.368 | 4.368 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #16 | 4.211 | 4.211 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #75 | 4.158 | 4.158 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #10 | 4.559 | 4.559 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #17 | 4.206 | 4.206 |
| Overall | #25 | 4.294 | 4.294 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #26 | 4.294 | 4.294 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #50 | 4.324 | 4.324 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #74 | 4.088 | 4.088 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #4 | 4.650 | 4.650 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #12 | 4.700 | 4.700 |
| Overall | #14 | 4.400 | 4.400 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #18 | 4.200 | 4.200 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #31 | 4.250 | 4.250 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #70 | 4.200 | 4.200 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #2 | 4.710 | 4.710 |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #2 | 4.903 | 4.903 |
| Overall | #4 | 4.510 | 4.510 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #5 | 4.516 | 4.516 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #19 | 4.194 | 4.194 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #65 | 4.226 | 4.226 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Art: how well does the art support the other content? | #17 | 4.654 | 4.654 |
| Playability: how easy would it be to run this module? | #20 | 4.192 | 4.192 |
| Overall | #23 | 4.338 | 4.338 |
| Writing: how clear and/or interesting is the writing? | #37 | 4.192 | 4.192 |
| Theme: how well would the module have fit into the Appendix N? | #42 | 4.385 | 4.385 |
| Layout: how easy is it to find all the presented information? | #43 | 4.269 | 4.269 |
