Thanks. It's added.👍
HelperWesley
Creator of
Recent community posts
I understand the frustration, I've taken part in a lot of jams where I didn't make it into the showcase video at the end of the jam. It's definitely rough after spending that much energy on the game.
But there were over 400 games submitted to the jam, all made by people who would have loved to be in the video, and I definitely can't cram 400 games into a single video, so the fairest thing to do is show games based on their rank in the jam.
Sometimes the judge voting and community voting don't line up, and more games end up being shown in the video, but this time they were both fairly consistent, so a lot of the same games got repeatedly shown, and fewer games were seen in the video overall.
The jam winners were announced on June 5th. 🔍👀
If your team won a prize in the jam, follow the instructions in our latest blog post about the jam:
https://gdevelop.io/blog/winners-gdevelop-game-jam-9
The announcement video is here if you'd like to watch it and see more about the jam:
The voting isn't quite finished yet, and then a video for the jam needs to be made.
It will be set to premiere at least 24 hours before it will be released, and we'll share the video link through all of our socials and email to make sure everyone knows when the results will be released. (The current plan is this Friday.)
Hey folks. 👋
We're putting together a playlist of videos made for/about games in the jam. 👇
GDevelop Game Jam 9 - Community Videos
If you make or know of any devlogs, gameplay videos, or playtesting videos that weren't included in this list, please share the name of the YouTube channel they're on in the comments of this post so we can look them up and add them to the list. 📝
(Please check to see if the video is already on the playlist before commenting.)
As the jam voting period ends, itch will unlock your game pages, and allow you to update your game files, but please do not update your game page for 72 hours (3 days) after the voting period ends. 🚨🚨
This is the time period when the judges will be looking for their favorite games in the jam, now that they've been sorted by community voting, to pick the games that will win the prizes listed under the Judges' Awards section on the jam page.
The community voted rankings, the judges picks, and the favorite games from our guest judges will all be announced in a jam winners video on the GDevelop YouTube Channel.
If you update your game file on itch, and we have no way to properly test your game in the state it was in during voting period, you may be excluded from the judges' voting list.
That's definitely possible.
We mostly focus on making sure the judge voting is done as fairly as possible, because those are easier to control, and those games will get the prizes in the jam. But it would be great if we could improve the accuracy of the community voting too. (Not that it's been a huge problem in the past. The results over the past jams that we've held were pretty fair, with only a little bit of randomness in the results.)
I'll add a note though for the next jam, to consider adding a rule about spamming/low quality review comments during the voting period. 👍
Game jams can be brutal, but the joy of having your game played and receiving some positivity/constructive feedback can make it all feel worthwhile. 😌
Consider checking out the "least rated" filter in the jam and giving those games some attention. 🔍👀
(Least rated has nothing to do with their score, it means less people have played/rated their game than other games in the jam.)
Tracking and moderating this sort of thing is unfortunately fairly tricky, since it would be hard to separate people who don't play the games at all from the people who are playing the games, but only very briefly and giving a score based on only a few minutes of gameplay. (That's not ideal either, but everyone is going to spend a different amount of time rating/playing each game.)
This isn't the exact same type of rate-for-rate that I'm asking people to avoid here in the community tab though, because this is (I'm assuming) at least asking people to play their game, and so if they follow that suggestions, the person who's spamming will still have to have a good game in order to get a higher rank because of it. (Total number of votes doesn't really say anything about what scores people have been giving their game.)
The type of rate-for-rate that I think really ruins jams is the kind where two people agree to rate each others games, because one or both people may give scores without ever playing the game, and if several people do that together, they can all end up with scores that don't reflect their game in any way.
You can definitely share and promote your games.
The only people who can rate your games are other people who submitted games to the jam, so more players won't change the rankings of games. So feel free to share it if you want more people to see your game. 👍
If you use #GDevelop on whatever platform you share it on, we might see it and share it too. 👍
As long as your game is on gd.games and itch.io, you're good.
Adding your gd.games URL makes it easier for us to check that both versions exist, but as long as your itch version got in before the deadline, and your gd.games version is up on the website, you're fine.
But please add the link to your gd.games version in your itch version game page description, so it'll be easier for us to find later. 👍
As long as your game is on gd.games and itch.io, you're good.
Adding your gd.games URL makes it easier for us to check that both versions exist, but as long as your itch version got in before the deadline, and your gd.games version is up on the website, you're fine.
But please add the link to your gd.games version in your itch version game page description, so it'll be easier for us to find later. 👍
I've seen rate for rate spamming ruin the scoring of jams in the past, and I'd like to see a fair and honest jam here.
It's alright to ask someone to play your game if you've played, rated, and gave feedback to their game. But blanket "rate for rate" callouts can really mess with ratings as people try to collect as many ratings as they can without playing/having their own game played.
If I find people posting blanket "rate for rate" posts here, they will be removed. If I find too much of that happening, the community tab will be removed entirely.
AI has become a part of many commonly used tools/apps, for things as small as removing background noise from audio to completely generating assets from scratch, and so we won't discourage people from using AI in their games.
Though we do require people to have the legal right to use all of the assets in their game, and we will be putting extra scrutiny on games that make it in front of the judges.
So AI is allowed to be used in the jam, but if you don't have the right to use the assets in your game, you will not be eligible to win a prize from the judges.















