Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

bonkmaykr

6
Posts
7
Following
A member registered Jul 03, 2025 · View creator page →

Recent community posts

(3 edits)

Please pay attention to what you are replying to. If politics are irrelevant to the quality of a project then Godot should not be enforcing a political echo chamber within theirs, denying commits or feedback from people they don't like. That was the entire reason it got forked. What you get with Redot is a development team actually interested in working on it instead of a bunch of CoC-abusers that contribute absolutely nothing and waste time. This perhaps isn't obvious to a casual end user or someone who doesn't work in software, but the trustworthiness and reliability of the people you base your commercial work on matters a lot. You seem to be aware that politics has no place here, so I have no idea why you think Redot is the problem.

(1 edit)

You've got it backwards. The problem is that they care and are stifling the development of their own project because PR among a certain hive is more important to them than just being a good option.

(1 edit)

If you knew anything about software development you would understand why political activism does not mix with it. Instead you're creating a fictional straw man to justify it.

Maybe making a game is something you should stay away from, because your customers will certainly not tolerate such an additude.

Not compatible with the version of sfml in the arch repos, is there a statically compiled build?

Sponsored by HowToBasic

A better example would be if you make your own version of Bosca. I don't think that the MIT license (nor any free software license for that matter) covers use of a program but only direct derivatives of it.