critizising a Game is one thing thats ok but you are just telling us everything that offends you and your little tiny world. Dude I saw Porns way worse in their phrasing and even my friends, who are trans, femboy etc. play that game saying "I wish someone would say/do that. Yes it is a little harsh here and there but in the end its a kink nothing more nothing less
The tags had no mention of degradation or discriminatory language, so it's fair to criticize the parts of the game that delve into such a direction. The fact that your trans friends have no problem with slurs doesn't mean that it's not an aspect that should be criticized when it isn't declared upfront. Yes, it's a porn game, but especially because of that it'd be nice if the game properly characterized trans girls and femboys as distinct groups of people that might generally like to be referred to with the fitting terms, instead of both groups being seemingly generalized as "looks female and has a cock, time to call them a boy and refer to them as a sissy", because when it is done that way, someone who is expecting proper inclusion of trans girls (as is declared in the tags) will be disappointed when there is no respectful inclusion to be seen. Criticizing flaws that detract from the enjoyment isn't "crying and being offended", it's applying standards to a game that doesn't properly match it's advertised tags and contents and instead treats the supposedly included tags as one and the same, and in an insulting way at that. If you're into degradation and femboys you will most surely enjoy the scenes, sure, but that isn't the only advertised genre you absolute gooner who can't even entertain the idea of constructive criticism to a product
I think the problem is that the original commenter, and maybe even you, haven't gotten to those characters yes. There are trans characters in the game. Hazel isn't one of them.
And I guess I'll tag that people talk dirty during sex? I honestly didn't think I'd have to tag that, but okay, I'll do that.
I wouldn't call the terms "sissy" or "cumdump" as being simple dirty talk - those are just outright derogatory or even slurs, but yes it'd be nice if you tagged that.
As for Hazel not being trans - that's what wasn't conveyed properly at the point of where the first sex scene ended, both in my opinion and seemingly that of the original commenter. It's an odd choice to make him rejoice over being referred to as a girl but still being called a boy at the same time, to me at least it made me be unsure if they were meant to be a femboy or if it was a derogatory portrayal of a trans girl, and I perceived it as the latter personally.
Yes, they are derogatory, and also, for some people (clearly not you) can be hot to say in bed. I already went ahead and tagged it.
And I feel like I do a pretty good job addressing that Hazel is a boy who likes to dress and act feminine and enjoyed the fact that the player didn't realize. He didn't rejoice, but he certainly enjoyed it. No one has had a problem in the year and a half the game has been out. I can reread it and try to make it more clear I guess?
If Hazel was supposed to be a trans girl, I would say "This is a trans girl" like when a trans character shows up later they say "I'm a trans guy, is that cool with you?" so deciding that Hazel is a derogatory portrayal of a trans girl is kind of on you, and you are free to have that interpretation, but he isn't. He is a guy.
Yeah, I understand now, I was just explaining how the wording, for me at least, made me come to that conclusion. Clearly it's also on me for not playing further to the point where it got cleared up more, so this was moreso just meant as my perception of the first chapter in an isolated setting :) Thank you for the kind replies and I wish you success with the project!
Wow, well then.
Yeah, Hazel is a dude. There are trans characters later. Hazel is a guy. A guy who likes to be feminine. He enjoys the player character's inability to be see him as a guy and rolls with it. This is addressed.
Yes, cumming in someone's coffee without their consent is bad. This is actually addressed in the game multiple times. It is not a good thing.
Hazel isn't a perfect person, no one is. He lies and goes along with things when he shouldn't. This is called a 'character flaw'. Hazel lies about a lot of things. Like being a virgin, which he can admit to the player later that he lied because it was hotter to say it.
Hazel calls himself a sissy during sex and the player rolls with it because it's clear that Hazel likes to be degraded a bit. It seems that people have taken umbrage with me not signposting that people like to dirty talk in a porn game, so I'll amend that.
Cafe Estro is a jokey name in a porn game. Please understand the genre you are engaging with. Also the name is a foreshadow for the manager who shows up later. Hazel isn't on estrogen. I believe I even talk about this in the game, but if not, I should.
Yes, I know anal sex doesn't quite work like that in real life. (I am a guy with a husband) But this is a porn game and if I were to portray anal sex realistically it wouldn't be a very fun game now would it? It's like watching a movie and asking why the characters aren't tired, or why they haven't gone to the bathroom, or where they get their ammo from, etc. Are they valid questions? Sure. But the answer is: It's a movie. You accept these things to suspend your disbelief to enjoy them. Like characters always being ready for anal sex, or cumming together romantically. It's a story.
This is a porn game. There are genre expectations that players of this genre are familiar with which is why I don't have a scene of Hazel douching prior to sex scenes.
I appreciate that you took so much time out of your day to play my game and engage with it that you decided to write this essay. But you seem to jump to a lot of conclusions and aren't willing to participate in the story being told. You want realism but don't understand that characters can lie.
If you want a 100% realistic porn game, you are never going to be truly satisfied.
Bro the only loser here is you, if you're talking about the fallout comic like I think you are bro legit explained what it was about and never mentioned anything about the AI, yet you would know that if you put in an ounce of effort before spouting nonsense. Then again, you're using the term "bigoted" unironically which says a lot more about you than the panel says about the artist.
Also "protecting against the sjw and their censorship"? Wtf are you on about ☠️? The sentence, which we both know isn't a direct quote so this is purely something you wrote hence the quotations, makes no sense on a stand alone basis and even with context is still poorly written and makes no sense. The elaboration to the comic, if you could read And comprehend it, stated that it was a commentary on the desexualization and hence uglified art/characters in movies and games. Which is factual, look at how they massacred MJ from Spiderman 1 to 2, straight up Crimson-Chin ah look.
Tldr: You're goofy bruh.
I wouldn't care too much what the cum guzzling, chromosome deficient, living birth defect has to say. I explained it to you, yet your response was a simple, and I mean that in every meaning of the word, "um, ackually, it means what i said and you're just stupid 🤓 ☝️" head ahh argument. You, I'll refer to you as it from now on, want to be upset about whatever because it's a pathetic individual that should have died at birth and disposed of in the proper receptacle to later become semi useful as a homeless persons snack, assuming they have no standards and don't mistake your off brand Quasimodo-clone fetus as a fetid and diseased rodent, rotted and malformed. The description of which still holds up with you currently being built like a question mark, shrimp spine, Kyphosis spokesperson, who's posture is saggier than your mamas tits you still suck the dust out of.
The artist is obviously bigoted and the creator of this game goes all the time in Twitter saying that he hates AI "art", and yet his lead artist defends and supports AI "art", and the "joke" was defending an incident of someone being both bigoted and a creep for using AI to edit the body of an actress just because her body "wasn't good enough for him"
Fair, fair enough. Maybe I went too far. 