critizising a Game is one thing thats ok but you are just telling us everything that offends you and your little tiny world. Dude I saw Porns way worse in their phrasing and even my friends, who are trans, femboy etc. play that game saying "I wish someone would say/do that. Yes it is a little harsh here and there but in the end its a kink nothing more nothing less
The tags had no mention of degradation or discriminatory language, so it's fair to criticize the parts of the game that delve into such a direction. The fact that your trans friends have no problem with slurs doesn't mean that it's not an aspect that should be criticized when it isn't declared upfront. Yes, it's a porn game, but especially because of that it'd be nice if the game properly characterized trans girls and femboys as distinct groups of people that might generally like to be referred to with the fitting terms, instead of both groups being seemingly generalized as "looks female and has a cock, time to call them a boy and refer to them as a sissy", because when it is done that way, someone who is expecting proper inclusion of trans girls (as is declared in the tags) will be disappointed when there is no respectful inclusion to be seen. Criticizing flaws that detract from the enjoyment isn't "crying and being offended", it's applying standards to a game that doesn't properly match it's advertised tags and contents and instead treats the supposedly included tags as one and the same, and in an insulting way at that. If you're into degradation and femboys you will most surely enjoy the scenes, sure, but that isn't the only advertised genre you absolute gooner who can't even entertain the idea of constructive criticism to a product
I think the problem is that the original commenter, and maybe even you, haven't gotten to those characters yes. There are trans characters in the game. Hazel isn't one of them.
And I guess I'll tag that people talk dirty during sex? I honestly didn't think I'd have to tag that, but okay, I'll do that.
I wouldn't call the terms "sissy" or "cumdump" as being simple dirty talk - those are just outright derogatory or even slurs, but yes it'd be nice if you tagged that.
As for Hazel not being trans - that's what wasn't conveyed properly at the point of where the first sex scene ended, both in my opinion and seemingly that of the original commenter. It's an odd choice to make him rejoice over being referred to as a girl but still being called a boy at the same time, to me at least it made me be unsure if they were meant to be a femboy or if it was a derogatory portrayal of a trans girl, and I perceived it as the latter personally.
Yes, they are derogatory, and also, for some people (clearly not you) can be hot to say in bed. I already went ahead and tagged it.
And I feel like I do a pretty good job addressing that Hazel is a boy who likes to dress and act feminine and enjoyed the fact that the player didn't realize. He didn't rejoice, but he certainly enjoyed it. No one has had a problem in the year and a half the game has been out. I can reread it and try to make it more clear I guess?
If Hazel was supposed to be a trans girl, I would say "This is a trans girl" like when a trans character shows up later they say "I'm a trans guy, is that cool with you?" so deciding that Hazel is a derogatory portrayal of a trans girl is kind of on you, and you are free to have that interpretation, but he isn't. He is a guy.
Yeah, I understand now, I was just explaining how the wording, for me at least, made me come to that conclusion. Clearly it's also on me for not playing further to the point where it got cleared up more, so this was moreso just meant as my perception of the first chapter in an isolated setting :) Thank you for the kind replies and I wish you success with the project!