Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
Tags
(2 edits) (+4)

Okay y'all i'm seeing so many comments of "this game is rushed" and stuff like that, but you guys have to take into account that this was made in a month, of course its gonna be a bit rushed, or the gameplay is gonna be short.The creator, Jenny Vi Pham wanted to make a game in a month, and this was her shot at doing so, and I think its a very very good game for her getting it done in a month. Another topic, if this is your first time playing, or if your friend is playing for the first time, tell them to not skip the content warnings?? I've seen so many people say they were shocked at the outcome of the game, but there was a disclaimer at the beginning of the game telling you to look at the content warnings before playing, and i'm tired of people trying to hate on Jenny and this game because they chose to not look at the content warnings. Before you come at jenny, she posted her reasoning of making this game on twitter, so before yelling or hating, please I beg of you, go look at her twitter.For those of you reading this, i'm not meaning to come off as rude, I'm just trying to say look at the details of a game before playing, and don't hate on the content creator, because they sometimes probably made the game for a reason, like Jenny did.But if you didn't like the game, just go play another one, don't waste time trying to criticize the creators and devs.then again, you can listen to this, or not. I really don't care, but please stop hating on Jenny. 

I would also like to add that this is only my opinion, and i apologize if i offended anyone.

(2 edits) (+26)

I wish dislikes were still turned on so I could dislike this reply without having to openly voice my displeasure. 

(+10)

I just noticed that the dislikes are turned off, did the author do it or..?

It's just the first time I've seen this..

(+16)

I think so. It’s because a lot of people are disliking replies in defense of Jenny, just like the latter comment. 

(1 edit) (+47)

I don't so much have a problem that there WAS suicide in the game but more in how awfully it was written (a cheap plot twist so she could guilt her fans into reverse-review bombing her game.) If she couldn't write about such a sensitive topic respectfully and with some actual tact, it should never have been included.


I mean, obviously she can write whatever she wants, but she shouldn't be shocked when people, particularly those who have been actually impacted by suicide in some way, criticize her for it.


Edit: Also, from what I understand, the content warnings were only added to the game AFTER people complained.

(+3)

YESSS I agree!!!

(+30)

First, this is a "play in browser" game that DID NOT feature content warnings during it's original release, meaning if you played this *IN* browser you'd be not given a warning prior to playing which is creator negligence. Her twitter response just added fuel to the fire, it connects some dots but overall it still doesn't make sense. As well as people should be allow to criticize things, if you post stuff on the internet (or much less make a game and beg your viewers/player/fanbase/etc to rate it 5.0 to get a "good ending.") people are going to say something about that. Did I mention overall the lack of care towards sensitive subjects?

(+21)

The content warnings were not added until just a few days ago.I played the game when it was first released and again yesterday to see what's changed. It did not have that pop up box in game when i first played.


Those warnings should have been in the game from the start.I don't blame people for being shocked.