"They" would imply the genderless, which in itself implies inclusivity. This whole notion of "equality" seems to be in good faith, but some people would get upset. We can't have anyone upset, can we? To ruffle feathers is to cause discontent. Why people from both sides of the argument, that "people should be equal" and "they shouldn't exist", can't coincide, is beyond you. Isn't that antithetical to this "equality" camp's argument, if they can't?
this is such a good paragraph because i swear that's what bugs me most about centrists. Like, obviously, if one group is just wanting equality and the other is like "nah we're going to try to make them not exist any more", there's no way to be center leaning on that. Literally unable to coincide. And the "isn't that antithetical" "gotcha" that those people try to pull
its the tolerance paradox. we can't tolerate intolerance, otherwise we would be allowing more intolerance to happen