Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
Tags

Ah, so you think I'm lying. Cool. Don't know what benefit I would gain from making this up, but whatever.

Here is a partial sales report of my DTRPG account from August 1 to August 10, 2019. I earned $3.25 from one sale, and $6.50 from another sale. I had previously withdrawn my royalty balance, so those two sales, total $9.75, are the sum available to me.

https://imgur.com/u4FzwTW

I initiated a payment for that royalty payment on August 11, 2019. The total included in the payout, shown here, is $9.75. That means money that had been paid to me by a customer less than 24 hours previously was included, not withheld.

https://imgur.com/4peZbWm

Here's the receipt of the PayPal payment. The timestamp of the request, above, was 6:58pm, and I had the money in my PayPal, minus a $1 processing fee, the same day.

https://imgur.com/f1WQznm

Satisfied?

Nope!

And what benefit do you have by lying? Well, the benefit must be great as I've heard lies about payment systems on other sites dozens of time, during my time as a moderator for Game Jolt, where the same discussion also comes back a lot.  Oh, and proof was never provided there either, and by now I even know some claims about itch.io were made that have now been denied by moderators here, so yeah, I wonder too what the point in lying is, but hey, I am not the one making these claims,so, how could I know 😜 Impatience comes to mind first. (that or misunderstanding of the systems other sites have).

Second, what you show is NOT what I asked for. I asked official documentation about the payment policies. None were provided. The screenshots you show wouldn't convince me that easily. First of all, the data on the screenshots isn't full, so no irrefutable relations are shown. Second, even if they were about the same payment, nothing's been proven. Multiple purchases could have taken place, of which the true purchase is outside of the screenshot, and that by coincidence somebody bought the same game just on the same day the previous purchase was paid out, which is just one of the dozens of theories that can... Oh, and in times of photoshopping I'm surprised you believe screenshots can convince anybody that easily.  (Most internet shopping sites do not provide the name of the buyer, since privacy laws don't allow them to).

And even if the claims are true, then DriveThruRPG must have some way in which they can do that in a risk-free way. Like I said before I don't believe only honest people make use of their service (as they'd be the first company in the history of mankind to which that happens), however if people get swindled through DriveThruRPG, they will get the blame and not the swindlers (that's how the human mind works) and I don't think DriveThruRPG can let that happen. They'd be out of business already if they were that naive. If they really pay out immediately, they must have some kind of safeguard. Can you show me the documentation on their site that proves this. And even if it's noted there some extra clauses must exist so they can catch things up. I was asking for this documentation on their part. Not for some screenshots which provide too little information.

If DriveThruRPG would just give out payments immediately without any kind of good reasoning behind it they'd be either a) stupid or b) beyond naive or c) not legal themselves. Either way I wouldn't do business with them, in that case (nor would ANYONE in their right mind), so if they do, I wanna see how they can do that, and laws in most countries obligate proper documentation on such things... Show me that... Not some non-informative screenshots, as they don't help me at all...

After some emails back and forth discussing the question with my publisher representative at DTRPG, the CEO, Steve Wieck, sent me this response:

"The short answer to your concern is that, yes, it’s a little bit crazy how we do things here. Most other marketplaces at all similar to us hold payments from sales far longer.

We are accepting a level of financial risk with our publisher payment process.

That said, we do take quite a number of precautions, but we don’t openly discuss those as general knowledge of them would allow bad actors to determine the best ways to game them."

Which is what I expected from the start: it's standard business practice not to publicly divulge exploitable details of financial practices. So, in short, you're probably not going to get a public run-down of what you asked for. 

Now that is already more like it.... If I could verify that is really written by an employee of that site, it would be great.

I see that they do admit how risky it is, and that it's crazy and that they are quite unique.... Altogether.... I don't trust them.