Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
Tags
(+1)(-5)

How about you read the replies before posting this

(1 edit) (+7)(-1)

Why are you telling me to read something when you couldn't even read the very obvious disclaimer that clearly states that every character that is depicted sexually is 18? Why do you even care anyway, no actual children are in danger right? If you don't like seeing TLH porn then just ignore it instead of thinking, "Y'know what? I feel like causing problems just because I don't like this." Why not do something productive, like joining the police force since you want to protect "children" so badly?

(+4)(-6)

"Why do you even care anyway, no actual children are in danger right?" Why are you using child endangerment as an excuse to watch child p*rnography, the fact you have little to no reassurance on the fact this game exploits the sexual orientation of canonically designed children is disgusting. So, from what you've just said, If someone labels a child as 18 years old and there is an opportunity for sexual interactions with this child, you're okay with that?

(+5)(-2)

There are no children involved, though.

(1 edit) (+4)(-2)

Jesus Christ, your skull is as thick as the mashed potatoes I had for thanksgiving. I never used "child endangerment" as an excuse to see CP, I used that as an example because quite literally nobody is getting hurt by this game. The characters in this game are fictional. If you don't know what that means, it means they aren't real. If a fictional character is stated to be 18 years old, they are 18 years old. You're also saying "If someone labels a child as 18 years old and there is an opportunity for sexual interactions with this child, you're okay with that?" as if I'd be sick enough to actually fuck a child. Once again, if you don't like The Loud House porn, then go away. Nobody forced you to be here, go on and do something productive instead of fighting in a losing battle.

(+2)(-5)

You stated nothing to resolve with this comment...

In your words for the second time now, "If a fictional character is stated to be 18 years old, they are 18 years old" You must clearly be ok with CANONICALLY underage children having sexual interactions because this ped*phile of a developer did nothing more then say they were 18 rather than, changing the appearance of the characters so degenerate ped*philes like you can miserably m*sterbate to this collection of child p*rnography.

Whether something fictional or not is put under a label, just because the label transcribes a subject into something different, doesn't mean it fully identifies under the label. In short, you can not take a picture of a child (fictional or not), call it 18, and use it as marketable p*rnography just because you decided it to be 18 years old.

It is illegal and is registered under child p*rnography...

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW:

Child pornography under federal law is defined as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer-generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor.

And WAIT there's more...

SIMULATED PORNOGRAPHY:

Simulated child pornography was made illegal with the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA). The CPPA was short-lived. In 2002, the Supreme Court of the United States in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition held that the relevant portions of the CPPA were unconstitutional because they prevented lawful speech. Referring to Ferber, the court stated that "the CPPA prohibits speech that records no crime and creates no victims by its production. Virtual child pornography is 'intrinsically related' to the sexual abuse of children".

You've lost.

(+5)(-2)

Pornography is protected under the First Amendment, mate, since it is considered a form of personal expression. Unless it depicts a real minor, it isn't illegal.

The only way it can be ruled illegal is under Miller's Obscenity Test, and that just goes case by case, and it only affects Supreme Court cases.

And all of that only applies to US. Luckily, the world isn't US.

(+1)(-1)

calm your fedora, sir