Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
Tags
 it would just boil down to the question of scale

Now you get it.

, and with allow lists that should almost be a non-issue (not saying it won't happen, but significantly less frequent),

But you still do not see, that there is no such thing as private messages on a website. They have to have moderators to intervene. They are accountable, if they do not act upon reports. (Oh, and what you call allow list ist just another word for a friend request and a whole infrastructure behind it)

And while we are at it, do you propose private messages on youtube as well? Oh wait, they had such and abandoned it... ;-)

But are you telling me this is actually one of the reasons Itch won't implement the feature? If so, that would be a "reason" not to have any private messaging system, anywhere.

That was in response to your reasoning, that those messages would be "private" and hence would not need moderation and some simple features would hand wave all the issues. At least that is what I understood from you. You invoked something like that to the explanation that such messages would not be implemented "because they would be a moderation and privacy nightmare".

Just because itch is not willing or able to tackle those issues does not mean no one could. But as I said, this costs money. I see no advertisments on itch that would pay for such a service. And all those services that are "free", are services where you are the product.

Not very familiar with a lot of other services, but that takes nothing away from the potential viability of the proposed solutions.

Actually it takes away quite a lot, like most of it. In other words, while you know nothing about running a public website with users accounts and having not observed any supporting evidence for the viability of your solutions you could cite, you think you know better than the people actually running such a site. If they say there are problems that are nightmarish to solve, I tend to believe them more than you. 

Bottom line, there are issues with such features. The details or wording of those issues are not really important. In the end it would just cost money to overcome those issues.

Your account is older than mine, did you never see comment sections, where people tried to scam developers? This even happened in public message board. Out in the open so to say. I shiver at the thought of the new hunting grounds the bad guys would get, if itch would implement a direct message system. Right now it has to occur in mostly public places, where not only the scammed could report, but anyone reading it could alert a moderator that something fishy is going on.

Steam has such bells and whistles, but they ask 100 bucks from wannabe developers up front and I believe they have harder sanitation for user accounts as well, And of course, they practially only have paid games or advertisement games, whereas most stuff on itch is free/pay what you want and advertisment is even frowned upon in games. I am not even advertised games on itch, unless I specifically browse for recommendations. Log into steam and you see game ads. What I am saying, they have the money. Itch does not. And implementing such features will not increase the money itch has to pay for the feature. In the long run such features might do good for a platform, but there probably would be a whole eco system needed around it. Itch does not even have public reviews or user tags.

But you still do not see, that there is no such thing as private messages on a website. They have to have moderators to intervene.

If the system is implemented properly, they are private in the sense that they are accessible only to the communicating parties until reported and even then, only the portion in question is made available to the moderators, not the whole history of everything that user(s) wrote to everybody, unlike public ones.

That was in response to your reasoning, that those messages would be "private" and hence would not need moderation and some simple features would hand wave all the issues. At least that is what I understood from you. You invoked something like that to the explanation that such messages would not be implemented "because they would be a moderation and privacy nightmare".

The part you quoted was solely in response to the screenshot issue.

and having not observed any supporting evidence for the viability of your solutions you could cite

The viability and the lack of real-world evidence was related only to the "disabled by default", not the PMs in general, not because I think this should be the new norm, but because I was informed that moderation issues were the main stumbling block. If you think this simple solution wouldn't reduce them substantialy, you are free to ignore it.

you think you know better than the people actually running such a site.

This conversation is starting to head in the wrong direction, so I will try and be very brief. Never said such a thing, unless you think that sharing ideas constitutes as "being smarter than the ones who are making this site". In that case, why does this forum section even exist?

(3 edits) (+1)
But you still do not see, that there is no such thing as private messages on a website. They have to have moderators to intervene. They are accountable, if they do not act upon reports.

Not true. While it's true that private messages online are never really private, moderators do not actually have to read and intervene in users' private messages unless they need to determine if a website/community rule is being broken (the same as on the bulletin board). The website is legally and morally accountable only for its rules/policies.

If you give users the choice to stop receiving messages from another user, or to opt out of the messaging system altogether, then you can easily define in the user agreement that the private messaging feature is to be used at the user's own responsibility, and at their discretion/control/choice. The moderators are not to be held legally accountable for private user interaction, and the content of user messages.

You make the whole thing safe as a community for everyone by including the private messaging feature in the same moderation policy that the rest of the website is in: meaning that if a private message is reported as breaking the rules, it can be easily sent to and reviewed by the moderation team (the same as a forum post). This makes things transparent.

And, just as with the forum posts, the user risks a ban of their account for repeatedly breaking the rules, even after a warning. So they can no more abuse the private messaging feature than they can abuse posting on the forums.

The private messages actually require very little moderation. They're an extension of the bulletin board, essentially.

So long as the user has control over the feature, there's very little need to moderate.