Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
Tags
(-1)

"It should be noted that I've been talking about things like five story buildings and duplexes, yet you bring up skyscrapers when I never mentioned them. Not sure why you are doing this."

I literally asked you what your goal is and whether you want to solve homelessness with your proposals, which you affirmed. Then you said that you want to build housing when there is demand of people wanting to get housing in a city. How many millions do you think you'll house with the buildings you've shown? And what will you do when another million wants to move to your city a year later. And then another million the year after that. And then another million. That's why you

That's why I'm saying that your "big numbers=good" worldview is bad. You can't simply match "whatever" demand by ever increasing supply, especially when one of the "problems" you seem to want to solve is affordability. (So if the new demand can't pay it, you'll have to reduce price even more by building even more housing.)

Anyway. I'm not sure why you are repeatedly bringing up Paris. Do you not know that e.g. the Banlieues exist? Maybe watch a documentary about those, just to remind yourself that not everything is like an upper-middle class downtown street in Paris.

(+1)

As I already mentioned above, Paris achieves it's density mostly through low rise density.



The majority of Paris looks like this, but more middle class.


Paris has over 2.1 million people.  It turns out these buildings can house them just fine.


Economists generally agree that building much more housing both lowers rents and meets demand:  https://www.upjohn.org/research-highlights/new-apartment-buildings-low-income-ar...


Banlieues tend to exist in suburbs of cities in France.  That's a strike against suburbs and for cities.

(-1)

Let's have the conversation in the other comment chain.