Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

Before the update, optimal solutions required ~1200 cycles and 20-24 cost. After the update, we know that we can achieve ~1200 cycles with costs in a wider range 20-112 and still be optimal - that is, cost plays a lesser role in achieving optimal solutions. Consequently, rooted solutions that are faster at the expense of having higher cost get better scores now.

Getting 360i for a rooted solution suggests that it was treated equivalently to an optimal solution. Is the cost*cycles product of your solution around 24*1200?

It is higher than that :P ofcourse if you want to lower the cycles, cost often grows exponentially

I see. Since your solution is neither superior nor inferior to any of the optimal solutions, it's scored based on cost*cycles. The product was greater than 24*1200, so it was given the score of an optimal solution, but rooted. Now it's compared against 112*1200, so it gets a higher-than-optimal score - because its cost*cycles is better than that of the newly-added optimal solution.