He is, but with improper licensing, it could not be legal to use, making that fact he’s providing it free of charge pointless, hence my point this whole thread.
What do you mean “nicer”? What am I doing that’s mean? Pointing out the potential legal issues he may be creating in using a crayon license?
Like I said, even if it was provided for free, the license could make it illegal to use. Also where did I ever once claim, or even imply I was entitled to it? It seems as though you’re purposefully misunderstanding my point.
Also I asked you a question, which you have not answered: What am I doing that’s mean?
