itch.io

You should still post a license so people know what the terms are before they download it, otherwise, you’re making what is legally an unusable asset.

Excellent work!

Do you think you could make the non-indexed color textures available? That way we could apply our own dithering and such if we want.

Thanks, good to know! I manage a collection of good low-poly 3D assets on this site, and sometimes people don’t leave any indication as to license, so I have to ask.

Request sent. Should have the same avatar as here.

Sure, what’s your username?

Nice! Got any examples? You have a soundcloud?

You do any ambient jungle?

What’s the license for this? CC0? It came up in search when searching for CC0 assets.

No probs!

Glad you like it.

I was in there, was gonna post an update about the engine I’m making, and when I scrolled down to find it, it was gone.

I tried to re-join, but it wouldn’t go through.

Where’d it go?

Could you specify the license in the description so people know how they’re able to use it?

I highly recommend making this available also as CC0 as there are some jurisdictions which do not recognize the public domain.

No probs.

Sure. @eightbit_dboy

Good luck with it. If you want help, hit me up. Could possibly use raylib to take care of many functions. If you do intend to reimplement it in C over github and under a public domain-equivalent license, like 0BSD or MIT-0, hmu.

I’d recommend stating explicitly that it’s public domain in the description, along with an option for CC0, as there are some countries which do not legally recognize the public domain.

It’s in ./game_kit_csp10/src/engine.bb

So it appears to be written in Blitz Basic. And the whole engine is all done in a single file that’s like 18,000+ lines of code.

Would be good to reimplement it in C or something.

I think you should include a proper FOSS license. Since the only requirement is to credit you, I think 2-Clause BSD or ISC would be a good fit.

Could you make this an AppImage?

Then you should probably put that in the description so it’s easier for people to find.

That's not a license, but it sounds like CC0 would encapsulate that sentiment. Would that be correct?

Awesome, thank you!
Also, you should probably put that in the description so people will know right away.

... which CC4? There are multiple versions.

Awesome! Thank you.
Also I recommend putting that in the description to make it a bit more obvious.

Right, but what's the license? CC0?

Awesome! Thanks for the clarification.

License?

What's the license?

What's the license? CC0? By the allowances provided, that sounds like a reasonable fit.

License?

What is the license? It says "License suited for commercial projects" yet fails to disclose exactly what the license is.

What's the license?

Is this also CC0/Public Domain?

No problem!

Nice! Might want to put that in the description in order to let people know.

Also might I suggest using CC0, as that's pretty much public-domain equivalent and there are some jurisdictions which do not legally recognize the public domain? You can say it's available as either public domain or CC0, too

License?

License?