What is the license? The description lists what you can do with it, but no actual license is provided.
8bitprodigy
Creator of
Recent community posts
You should put the license in the description then, so people can know what the license is BEFORE they download it.
Also why would it be marked CC0 if the license is different? That would cause confusion, and you should also be careful with the wording for custom clauses/licenses, as they could render your work legally unusable.
That doesn’t help at all, it’s not clear what “commercial free” refers to specifically, and without a license, there’s no way to know what the limitations to use are.
Do you mean it’s public domain? If so, I highly recommend also putting it under CC0 since there are some jurisdictions in which public domain is not recognized, such as Germany.
Not really.
Just so you’re aware, “CC-NR” isn’t an actual Creative Commons license, as you can’t create one by prefixing “CC-” to custom terms. If someone doing serious commercial work gets into a dispute over this, your license may not hold up. You’d be better off using an established license like CC-BY-NC-ND which covers most of what you’re trying to restrict here.
I did leave them alone… Two months ago.
And the fact that it’s super-clean/nice doesn’t resolve the fact that they didn’t provide a license, which is what I was asking for. Why is it wrong for me to ask for an actual license in order to cover my bases?
Also if it is CC0, then I am free to use/modify/redistribute/etc. this asset however I wish with absolutely zero restriction, effectively a public-domain equivalent license. However, the author clearly stated there are restrictions on how the asset may be used, which makes it clear they are NOT providing it under CC0 licensing.
Thanks for demonstrating why making the license an asset is provided under explicit is so important, however.






