If you 'cry' AFTER seeing credits and not during the game, enjoying its quality, it says you care more about that AI narrative than about actual quality of games.
Using no AI instruments don't make a game automatically better in every way than a game made with those. And there are many such good games made with using AI.
I see people all over the internet who cry about AI slop poisoning it but they can't even distinguish AI content from human content. I despise those people. I think that if AI content is so good that you can't see a difference you can't call it 'slop' just because it's made by AI.
You make a fair point, and I do agree with it in some aspects. However, I do feel like you also undermined what I was saying.
AI is like salt; there are some people who love putting a lot of it in everything, and to them, it makes things better. But, in the end, the usage of that just comes down to your personal taste. While salt may make a meal taste good for some, it can ruin it for others.
Regardless, your talking points are just as valid as mine. I did not mean to cry about AI slop, I just became tired of seeing a large amount of blatantly AI games that were, importantly, very low quality and effort.
Once again, it's up to your discretion how much AI you like to use or see. For me personally, though, I just wanted to praise the human innovation, because it means that people had to come together and connect to make the one awesome output that is this game. Cheers!