83.2142 is actually intentional lol. I like stupidly precise numbers and I thought puting the excact number instead of "around 80" would stand out. Apparently it did just maybe not in the way I expected.And yes I used AI while making the game. Ive never tried to hide that. But saying it's "99% AI with maybe a little human touch" just because you recognize a certain look is honestly a pretty unfair assumption. You can say the visuals feel AI-made, you can dislike the game completely that's all fair feedback. But telling someone how much of their own game they actually made, how much effort they put into it, or how much they cared about it when you simply don't know that is a different thing. I spent a lot of time on this project because I genuinely wanted to make something I liked. AI was a tool I used during that process, not a measurement of how much I cared about the result. As for Starglass , I can't speak for other people's games. I can only tell you how I made mine. So criticism of the game is completely fine. I just think the "99% AI, little human touch" part goes beyond criticizing the game and starts making assumptions about the person behind it.