Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+1)

One of the things I like in this game is how you can lose slowly (and yes, the thing that pushes my buttons most is losing). 

I love not quite inescapable yet very stacked situations. Multiple turns where I don't have green to escape a draining kiss, for example. What I'm not such a fan of is Slimantha bitchslapping me to death in 3 turns flat when we're at neutral size.

So short version is I'd like more of the former, less of the latter, YMMV ofc.

As for how to achieve that (maybe on a future enemy as I think your enemy design is already mostly set for the current two) - I'd suggest adding mechanics that can be foreseen a little in advance. 

For example, say a warning card gets played 3 turns (or next deck cycle) before and the player has to meet some requirement before the end of that turn. Then failing to prevent it puts a long term (5-15 turns) debuff on. 

The debuff should be something disruptive on it's own that can become overwhelming if stacked (like the slow down debuff level of power, or shop price increases or discard every x cards played) (but you'd want various different effects with different triggers, making it tricky to keep track of). 

This can hopefully lead the player to a downwards spiral of debuffs making it harder to meet the requirements for future debuffs and eventually the tiny player gets permanent debuffs applied and is slowly brought to defeat.

Agreed on slow, enjoyable losses given the, well, purpose of this game. 

I'd also like to add for Slimantha specifically that for a growing player, her specific card that sets to 30% player size makes it basically pure rng on whether she bothers to use it and get an instantaneous comeback or not, making it near impossible to establish a large size difference and use the interesting big cards. I think the flood of slime shrinker cards is a much more thematic and interactive mechanic for her to come back with, and the 30% card could use a rebalance.

On the opposite side as well but less related, when getting really tiny, it's annoyingly hard to avoid the basically-guaranteed-lose vore play situation if you're not particularly into that.