Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

buinl

2
Posts
A member registered Apr 18, 2022

Recent community posts

Agreed on slow, enjoyable losses given the, well, purpose of this game. 

I'd also like to add for Slimantha specifically that for a growing player, her specific card that sets to 30% player size makes it basically pure rng on whether she bothers to use it and get an instantaneous comeback or not, making it near impossible to establish a large size difference and use the interesting big cards. I think the flood of slime shrinker cards is a much more thematic and interactive mechanic for her to come back with, and the 30% card could use a rebalance.

On the opposite side as well but less related, when getting really tiny, it's annoyingly hard to avoid the basically-guaranteed-lose vore play situation if you're not particularly into that.

Firstly, this version is deprecated. You have to go to their website to get the newest version. Which is ridiculous that you can't even play this old version at all, due to the always online system elaborated on below.

Secondly, I do not recommend wasting your time. Always online, required to give your email to make an account, relatively small amount of content for the absolute grind fest that it is, and extremely pay to win. Anti-cheating is enforced via the online account system, taking a softcore erotic flash game far too seriously. 

It sucks because there's a good game here underneath all that (though we may have the original dev to thank for that more than the remaker), but the total contempt for casual/free player's time is so off-putting that any money I might have offered for good bonus content, I refuse to do so just to make the main game loop progress at a bearable rate. This behavior is annoying coming from megacorporations, obnoxious from niche fetish game devs. This reminds me of if Ubisoft execs managed a gts game.