Sigh. What you do here is reading things into words that were not said. You bascially do a sort of false strawman. You misrepresent a position by using a similar other position and then attack that other position. Like exchanging generated by with contributed. Or assisted.
The word assisted was never used in the ai disclosure and not in the discussions going on here, except by users.
leafo responded to a question where ai was used in an assitive manner, but clarified that this would not be the generative usage. What more do you need?
(1) So, if I use ChatGPT to debug and help me with code, do I also need to include a tag indicating it was made with AI?
You’re going to have to use your best judgment here. If you asked ChatGPT a question about something solely to inform yourself, then it sounds like your project doesn’t (2) contain content from generative AI. If you used ChatGPT to generate (3) some code that you then inserted into your project, then I think it’s fair to say your project does contain content from generative AI.
(1) Debugging is a way of assisting.
(2) Indirect way = not content
(3) Direct way = containts content by generative ai
So yeah, using "ai assisted" as the name for the meta filter was a very confusing choice of words. It does not reflect what people can read into that word, and what the ai disclosure intends to reflect.