CNC is a scenario where participants agree beforehand to engage in sexual acts where one's consent is ignored.
Participants: Me, creator of game. You, player who consented by actively choosing to play the game.
Sexual Act: Consuming the sex scene.
Scene: Fictional Rape scene.
I understand how this could be harmful to those who don't understand how BDSM works, but the scene itself is fantasy and it is okay to consume it through fiction, because playing a game is practicing something that would normally be deemed unethical in a safe, consensual environment just as how IRL CNC works; role-playing an unethical scene with a trusted partner in a safe and consensual environment. The game was made and advertised for people with CNC kinks, which is why I used the term "Non-cons", but I could switch it back to "Sexual Violence" in the CW if that would be more accurate.
I know how to practice BDSM and have experience in the community as well. I'm sorry that impression did not come off clearly. Consent is very important to me and my partner, which is why we practice our taboo kinks through a safe fictional medium, such as games, fanfictions, etc.
It seems like you got Non-con and CNC confused. Yes, the scene itself is Non-consensual, but if you (the real person) don't consent to it, you can just click off the game just like a safeword, therefore the rules of CNC applies. There are trigger warnings to make sure you know exactly what you're getting into. A non-con game, so I don't see how the tags were inaccurate.

Your other criticisms are valid, because to each their own. I am confident in my queerness, and the characters were based on me and my partner, who are in a queer T4T relationship. My character is an immoral cannibal yandere who is not supposed to be a dom, and it is made clear with the death endings. It is a fantasy for many, which I provided. I, the person behind it is a dom who practice these fantasies with a trusted partner or in fiction. Please re-evaluate your views on separating fiction and reality.

