when are you going to get a real artist for this game instead of using AI the game has a good concept but the AI art just ruins it, also if you do get a real artist maybe make the scenes animated and add a bit of voice acting or sounds?
And how do you think the hundreds of other game on this plateform do exactly? You know, all the ones that DON'T use AI?
I don't know about you but when I go to a restaurent I expect to not be served micowaved food, I can make that myself at home. Anyone can make AI shit themself, and better ones at that, you can tell just by the tails (or lackthereof in half the images) that the guy didn't even gave a fuck about using good result...
If you use AI the BARE MINIMUM should be to throw away the images that look like shit... Just look at the gap between Malo's legs when you talk to her...
The AI use has nothing to do with this, by the way. The dev can speak for themselves about QA and QC regarding the images they use, but that doesn't justify the user above expecting real art, voice acting, and animated scenes from the developer just because they want it. Bringing up other successful games doesn't have anything to do about commenter's expectations above.
This is simply a means to point out to these types of demands are unrealistic and disrespectful ("...the AI art just ruins it"). The developer can do what they wish with their project, and the users can either take it or leave it.
Show some support and offer constructive criticism instead of tearing down the project.
Brother not everyone's a scatophile, if you like gobbling up shit, good on you, some peoples do have the bare minimum of standards when it comes to art tho, especialy when as I said, you can EASILY generate much better stuff than that, for exemple personaly I'd take a shity amateur artstyle that look like a children's doodle over the same soulless regurgitated garbage I've already seen 3 billions times in the past 3 years, and don't get me wrong, I don't have an innerent problem with AI art, I do have a problem with the clearly lazy one tho..
As I said, you didn't even put the bare minimum efforts of sorting and using WELL generated images over the crappy ones, why should anyone expect you to put enough effort to ever finish your project when this website is FULL of abandoned games that were made by peoples that clearly had more passion for what they were doing?
Like imagine having the GUTS to ask peoples to "help funds new content, events and characters" when you DON'T FUCKING DRAW THE CHARACTERS (nor do you even create any since it's all popular ones), you could pump out THOUSANDS of them in a single day, what is there to fund exactly? You don't pay for artists or voice actors and you don't even spend your own time to deserve a salary. And don't tell me you spend time on the gameplay part when it's consist of showing a half bottle if they are fake and full one if they aren't...
Bro, the amount of pretentious bullshit you just wrote is impressive. Let me explain it to you:
You're acting like some elite art critic while throwing a tantrum over AI like a triggered baby. Newsflash: not everyone is a scatophile like you who enjoys eating shit. Some of us actually enjoy this AI furry game and we don't need your permission.
You keep crying that it's "soulless regurgitated garbage" you've seen a billion times... yet here you are, still watching and complaining for 3 years straight. If it's so bad, why are you still here? Go touch grass and play something else instead of obsessing over a game you "hate".
Calling it lazy is crazy when the dev is pumping out content faster than any traditional artist could. You say you prefer "shitty children's doodles"? Cool story, that just proves your taste is actual garbage.
And no, people aren't stupid. They know it's AI and they still support the game because they like it. If you hate AI furry games so much, just leave and stop ruining the fun for everyone else with your superiority complex.
You're not a critic, you're just a salty hater mad that people are enjoying something you don't. Go fund your "real artists"
I love how the internet is filled with illeterate morrons that feel the need to give their opinions when they don't take the time to read a simple message...
If you knew how to read a basic sentence, I precisely said that I have nothing against AI in itself, it's the LAZY MF who don't even fucking sort out the garbage result that I have an issue with.
"Calling it lazy is crazy when the dev is pumping out content faster than any traditional artist could."
Holly shit that's the most retarded sentence I've read in a while... like how many generations of incest does it takes to result in being THAT retarded???
NO SHIT, that's the whole fucking point of pressing a bouton and geting a result without having to do anything, OBVIOUSELY it's fucking lazy. Brother I have a folder with 20k+ AI genrated images, I know first hand how little effort it takes, so YES it is, in fact, lazy to not even care abouty using good results over bad ones, it's like a factory, he's pumping out product at a rapid pace, the bare minimum is making sure the thing he sell don't look like shit.
if you don't care then go collect missprinted cards, bootlegs figures and damaged product, but most peoples when they pay for something, they want the product to look like what they paid for, not 85% of it, if the tail is missing on half the images for one character, that's the proof he doesn't give a fuck about selling you what you paid for.
If you want an exemple of some of the shit you can achieve with putting the BARE MINIMUM of eforts in, you can check somes of mine here: https://pixai.art/en/@nowan/artworks and better yet, I don't charge anything for it.
Also no offence, but you're so fucking retarded I highly doubt you're old enough to engage with thatsort of content in the first place.
Using AI isn't lazy, it's efficient as fuck. I generate thousands of images in minutes and filter the best ones to deliver free content and constant updates, while most non-AI devs abandon their projects because they can't afford artists. You yourself admit you have 20,000 AI images, so you know how fast it is. You criticize not filtering "trash" because of missing tails or glitches, but demand manual perfection when well-used AI beats the childish doodles you prefer. That's pure hypocritical elitism.
You contradict yourself: you say "I have nothing against AI", but then call it "soulless regurgitated garbage" and "shit" that anyone does better. If it's so easy and bad, why does it bother you so much? You prefer "shitty amateur artstyle" with "soul" over efficient AI. Pathetic. You show your PixAI gallery as an example of "minimum effort" but attack the game for the same thing. Total hypocrisy.
Funds are for gameplay, events, servers and maintenance, not for "drawing" like you think. The dev doesn't charge artist salary because AI speeds everything up, and the platform is full of successful AI and non-AI games. Other devs use AI the same way and it works. Your microwaved restaurant comparison is bullshit: people play for free and get regular updates.
You ignore that filtering thousands takes real time, not a magic button.You attack passion when the game has more content and updates than many "soulful" ones.You call people retarded and question age while spitting childish insults.You say "anyone generates better" but show yours as superior, admitting AI is viable.
If you don't like efficient AI, go lick amateur doodles and stop crying about free stuff. The game delivers what it promises: fast and constant furry NSFW. Your elitist standard is the real problem.
Yes actually, AI is a lazy development process dude, what point is there in a game to throw simple words and phrases around and clicking a generate button for images over putting in the effort to draw and animate them much more effectively, saying using AI for game development is efficient only shows just how smooth your brain has become, AI is lazy, sloppy and otherwise nonefficient when it comes to development, you have to constantly scrap shitty images and animations it generates meanwhile an ACTUAL ARTIST could hand draw or even use an actual app on their computer or tablet to create and animate way more efficiently than what AI gives you, you're absolutely wild for calling AI efficient, sounds like you need to take your own advise and go touch grass dude, you need the fresh air in your lungs talking nonsense like that and calling someone's opinion on something "elitist standards" is retarded, sounds more like you're projecting yourself onto someone else because the way you're talking tells me who is actually coming across with these so called "elitist standards" Grow up dude, getting your pussy all hurt over an opinion is such childish bullshit anymore.
Look, I understand wanting to do everything by hand and feeling proud of pure manual work — that’s your choice.
But calling AI in game development “lazy, sloppy and nonefficient” is straight-up wrong in 2026. Yes, AI outputs are often inconsistent, animations need heavy cleanup, styles break across scenes, and you scrap a ton of garbage generations. Copyright issues are real and some games get called out for it. Nobody denies those problems.
The reality is different for most indie and solo devs: tools like Leonardo AI with custom LoRAs, Scenario, or Meshy let you generate consistent sprites, textures, tilesets and concepts in minutes instead of days. You iterate 30 variations fast, pick the best, then hand-refine the key assets and animate the important parts yourself. That’s not laziness — that’s smart use of time.
Solo devs using AI finish prototypes and full games much faster, focusing their limited hours on gameplay and polish instead of grinding 500 background tiles by hand. Even bigger titles have used it for concepts and filler (like some Ubisoft and Treyarch pipelines). Pretending this has “zero value” just ignores how the industry actually works now.
If you prefer spending weeks drawing every pixel manually, go for it. But don’t bash people using available tools as “smooth brain” or “lazy” just because you like the old way
the industry is changing.