Awesome! you're the first person that tests a theory that beats SFOM in any training run since 2025!
I think your caveats are good, but it's still interesting to see that SFOM beats DT in 2/3 and beats its total average too, despite it being only a couple sentences versus the far more fleshed out DT submission! (In the future automated & expanded system + theories, it will be interesting to see how these all fair out!).
I overlooked DT and think there's a lot of good convergence between it and what fleshed out advanced SFOM from the time and, the theory without name fleshed out since then has in many regards, it shared w/ decision theory & neo expected utilitarian frameworks. I like that it's trying to reduce things to one axiom. I'll unpack w/ more time, but it's interesting signal and historically interesting!
I like to see others already pushing back with the system itself and testing it! and I love ur idea of testing other world religions too! I think the expanded system should essentially catalogue all philosophies, cultures, religions, etc. and also break them down into claims, beliefs, arguments, etc. to show their overlap, recombine them. benchmark and test at the atomic level and then their overall, and therefore recombine them, etc. pick from eachother's learnings, etc. test them in the fullest resolution possible,etc.