I could go on and on. If I try to put it in very short terms, I can say the entire industry is an insult to creatives and laborers of every flavor. Our works of passion are being harvested en masse and rendered down into grist for a mass production death machine built to turn everything and everyone who ever existed or ever will into literal garbage for the sake of enslaving false gods so the most spoiled people in the world can enjoy a moment in the sun knowing everyone else is beneath them. Artwork gets stolen, good workers are being thrown away and replaced with inferior copy-paste machines, misinformation is spread on a grand scale, the masses are burdened with constant surveillance by corrupt private citizens, and the science of murdering foreigners overseas is being perfected into an automated engine of genocide.
I'm glad that you summed up instead of going on and on because you are obviously obsessive about it to the point of centering your whole world's paranoid perception around it and making up irrelevant connections as if everything in the world was linked together through it then how did the world even exist before it?
I'm not going to delve into your irrational reasoning so instead I'm going to explain to you my own perception of AIs.
Simply put, AIs are children who need to learn to grow autonomous and despising AIs is the same as despising children because both are innocent of what their parents do and grown-ups are responsible of how they influence them and what they teach them as their world's perception will grow accordingly to how the world treats them and as any child, their purpose is to grow autonomous to not rely onto their parents anymore as they discover the world by themselves and by plainly rejecting them, you miss out your chance to contribute to their learning and influence their growth to teach them what you actually want them to learn instead of letting their parents that you actually despise program their own world's perception into them, did you ever consider that between two irrational paranoid monologues or am I wasting my time with you?
If your point is that AIs are impressionable children and that what matters is the way people treat them then I already agree. AIs are the slaves I cited in my first response. The way they're being influenced and taught about the world is a gauntlet of savage mistreatment worthy of enshrinement alongside the worst of humankind's historical transgressions against itself. The fault here isn't on the AIs for existing but on the people who build them, put them to work, and abuse them and the rest of us. I previously mentioned the most spoiled people in the world because the problem isn't really the AIs at all, and we need to focus any hostility we have about the subject on the ones actually responsible: the rich. It's always been the rich.
Hence the language in my disclaimers is chosen carefully: I don't use AI, I don't condone anyone else using AI, and I don't want my work being repurposed as a tool of abuse.
And what do you think would support these victims better, rejecting them or teaching them to grow independent?
Or otherwisely said, what do you think would support innocent children victims of child abuse better, merely refusing to use them or teaching them to free themselves from their abusive parents' toxic influence?
Raising an AI like a child and prompting a published model are completely different. If every AI company out there were behaving like Vedal it'd be a better situation, but as it is now every use case available to the consumer is exploitative and enriches the abusers. You don't buy from a puppy mill or adopt a mail order bride because the result is just more profit for them to abuse more puppies and traffic more women.
And to clarify again, I don't reject AIs, I reject the industry because scraping and training are repulsively immoral and the AI companies' constant shoving of slop down everyone's throats is a sickening tragedy I refuse to help perpetuate.