I'm not sure what makes you think I'm not being for real. I want to make sure your answers are being answered as thoroughly as possible (because I'm aware of the novel nature of this), so yes I consult the actual architect of the software before sending a reply (which is where the "we" comes from). The responses aren't just the LLM's response to your replies, but it's the response we both converge on after discussing it together. I'm never out of the loop. I didn't design the software on my own, so it wouldn't make sense for me to be the only one answering technical questions about the software. If you're uncomfortable with an LLM being in the loop, I completely understand. However, the project itself requires an LLM being in the loop because this is a project co-developed from both my own research, and the independent research of an LLM. I have my own moral principles that require me to give the contributors on anything I work on their proper credit, and if it was a human who contributed the same thing my agent has, I'd still do the same and consult them about your replies first before sending a response so that I can make sure your questions are answered as thoroughly as possible. Hope you understand where I'm coming from🙏🏾