Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
Deleted 7 days ago
(+1)

Your arguments are formally wrong and they are factual wrong and they are offtopic copy pasta.

https://ubos.tech/news/generative-ai-in-gaming-survey-shows-85-gamers-negative/?...

It is not a small group that gatekeeps and has negative opinion about ai in games. It is the vast majority of gamers that think so.

To go on topic again, as this topic is not about ai, but about filtering.

Some people flood the market with low effort projects. It's the low effort that makes it slop. And the usage of ai makes it ai slop.

You might not have noticed, but OP did not ask for a filter to filter out ai. This would be trivial, as there is one: https://itch.io/game-assets/tag-no-ai 

OP asked to filter out publishers.

Deleted 7 days ago
(1 edit) (+2)

AI stuff sucks. I will keep calling it "slop" as long as it is slop, and I will call out AI slop spammers as long as they keep spamming low-effort, ugly, uninspired, worthless slop.

I do not want to buy low-effort, ugly, uninspired, worthless slop farted out by an uncaring algorithm and I do not want to put that worthless slop into my game. If you think that is "gatekeeping", I am fine with that. You are wrong about what that word means, but you are entitled to being wrong.

I also didn't read your entire comment because it is, in itself, clearly AI slop designed to waste my time. (Compare this with the other posts of the same author in the thread, none of which have even remotely the same style.)