If you want those questions answered, the best person to ask would be Sheep, the developer himself.

Most of us don’t really complain about how the game works. We simply enjoy the game for what it is.

┐(´ー｀)┌

Sometimes, certain situations in the story may not make perfect sense at first.
But if you dig deeper and try to connect the pieces together with a bit of assumption, some things start to make more sense.

If you don’t like how small actions can lead to a bad ending with no way to undo them, the best thing you can do is try to contact Sheep directly and ask him about it.

That’s simply the way the game was designed.
It’s how Sheep intended the game to be played.
If the mechanics were really that bad, the game probably wouldn’t have gathered so many fans over the years.

Sheep also rarely reads posts on Itch.io.
And even when he does reply, his responses are usually very short.
So even if he answers your post, it probably won’t give you the kind of detailed explanation you’re hoping for.

People have been bringing up similar complaints for years, and honestly, the developers are already pretty tired of hearing the same arguments again and again.

About PriestBot and Jun:

PriestBot has been modified with weapons and military technology.
He’s basically a walking killing machine disguised as a harmless robot.

Jun, on the other hand, was designed mainly for sex and intimate interaction.

So, expecting Jun to detect hidden military-grade technology probably wouldn’t make much sense.
Unless she was secretly designed for war as well, which seems unlikely.
If she actually had those abilities, the story would have shown them already, especially during moments when Anon was in danger.

What we do know about Jun is that:

• Her AI is extremely advanced and very human-like.
• She can taste food and cums.
• Her body is very durable.
• She has impressive physical strength,  strong enough to run after a bus and even force the door open.

Compared to PriestBot, Jun is more advanced in terms of AI, body design, and physical capability.

But PriestBot clearly has the advantage when it comes to weapons and military technology.

Jun even said herself that she didn’t notice the hidden camera.
She even asked PriestBot to install or download some kind of detection software for her.
(It’s been more than half a year since I last played the game, so I might not remember every detail perfectly.)

About me using ChatGPT:

Yes, I did use ChatGPT to help rewrite some of my replies.

The reason is simple: when I write messages myself, they often sound harsh or unfriendly, even when that’s not my intention.
It can easily look like I’m trying to argue or start a debate.

If any of my messages sounded rude before, I’m sorry about that.

I do understand English, but it’s not my native language, and I don’t use English in daily life.
Using AI to help rewrite my messages just makes them clearer and easier for others to understand.

From the way you reacted, it seems like you may not like people using AI.

And honestly, that’s completely understandable.

How people use AI matters a lot.

Many people dislike AI because it learns from real human work.
Some see that as stealing, especially when it comes to AI art or generated content.

But you could also think about it in another way.

Imagine a child learning how to draw an apple.

The teacher shows an example, and the child practices again and again.
At first, the drawings don’t look very good. But the child keeps learning, improving, and eventually becomes skilled enough to meet the teacher’s expectations.

Is the child’s drawing an exact copy of the teacher’s example? No.
Is it stealing? No.

The child created it with their own effort after learning from examples.

AI works in a similar way.
It learns patterns from information and then generates something new based on that knowledge.

The real problem is not the AI itself, it’s how people choose to use it.

Some people use AI responsibly.
Others overuse it or try to replace human work entirely, which is why many people feel uncomfortable about it.

Interestingly enough, some people are already experimenting with integrating AI concepts into Jun inside the game.

So if players continue developing and training her systems over time, who knows?

Maybe one day Jun might feel a little closer to being "alive" inside the game.