Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+3)(-2)

Maybe explain, why you chose AI to generate the game and how you'll fix the bugs. Thanks.

(+2)(-7)

I didn’t use AI to generate the game — the entire codebase is written and built by me.
I only used AI tools to help speed up debugging, polish, and UI ideas (just like using StackOverflow or Google).
Bugs were fixed through player feedback and manual testing.
More optimizations and content updates are already planned.

Thanks for supporting RiftWave Clicker!

(+1)

Even THIS text is 100% AI generated... https://www.scribbr.com/ai-detector/

(-2)

DAWG… just because I can write a clean, formal sentence doesn’t mean it’s AI. And yeah, I use AI sometimes—who doesn’t? Why you fuming like it personally offended you?

(+1)

Lol, dude. the formatting and use of em dashes makes you look like ai. How did you even make a "—" while typing? The dash on the keyboard is "-". No one is gonna believe you're not AI.

(-3)

Lmfao I just use it cuz my keyboard has it and I’m used to it 😂 but i get this a lot tho 🤣

(+1)

Sorry to be skeptical, but what keyboard is this?

(3 edits) (+2)(-5)

Maybe explain, why you chose to complain about AI usage on multiple games you played for free? Thanks.

(+3)

Low to no effort. I also made some "games" via Gemini or ChatGPT, even Claude. I know the limits if you don't pay the highest tier and split coding into parts. You have to have a concept and know how to code to even get the prompt right. Sure you can say: Make me a game that does this or that. But you'll never be able to fix it, if you don't even know what line of code is bad. So... now you have the answer.

(-6)

stop being Jealous of him lil brotatochip😭🙏

(+2)

Someone is sick of obnoxious behavior (writing code with AI that doesn't even work) and you have no counter so you go with, "u jelly?" Grow up :)

(-1)

That answer is pretty contradictory, don't you think?

"Low to no effort [...] that requires to have a concept and know how to code to even get [it] right".

This very contradiction was precisely the reason for my comment. They're putting in effort, as per your own statements, for something that is freely available.

They surely could put in more effort... but why? Do you go to work on a unicycle cause the car is too low effort? And is what he's doing in any way different from copy/pasting the code in Stackoverflow comments?