Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(1 edit)

So I love the idea of "make the rules fit the seating" instead of "make the seating fit the rules"!

I did get a little stumped on the second one, where I put together the rule "At least one goblin next to elf".  The "VERIFY" result seems to show the second row not working when it's "goblin - elf - goblin", but that row does indeed have at least one goblin (in fact, two) next to every elf in it.  What is it that's wrong with that solution?

EDIT: I'm not entirely clear on the grammar of the rules.  Does "at least one goblin next to elf" mean there's at least one goblin next to every elf, or that there's at least one goblin next to some elf?

The other thing that's not clear is that I think I'm gathering that the rules have to uniquely determine the row, and not just allow the row to be satisfied?  That would explain why "At least one elf seated" isn't valid in the second puzzle (even though it's perfectly satisfiable, with either "goblin - elf - elf" and "goblin - elf - goblin").  I think that probably wants to be more explicit.  Even with that, though, I don't know why "At least one goblin next to elf" fails on the second row, since "goblin - elf - elf" doesn't have at least one goblin next to each elf.

(1 edit)

Hey Tahnan, thanks for playing! Sorry, the objective of the game is not the most direct, so I'll try to clarify.

The rules need to both satisfy and uniquely determine each row. In the 2nd puzzle, "At Least One Goblin Next To Elf" could lead to two results for the 2nd row: [Goblin, Elf, Goblin] and [Goblin, Elf, Elf]. You want your rules to constrain each row to one result.

Think of "Next to" as "Next to a". So in your case, "At least one goblin next to an elf" means theres at least goblin that is next to an elf in each row.

EDIT: also future terms:

- Left/Right of: means a character is somewhere to the left/right of another. For example "at least one goblin left of (a) elf" would be satisfied by [Goblin, Dwarf, Elf], or [Dwarf, Goblin, Elf]