Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(2 edits) (+1)(-1)

To get in front of the most uninteresting and overplayed insult, these comments were not a matter of "touching grass", they were a matter of free time - comment "get a job" or something along those lines. 

If you're gonna be petty, at least be accurate, please.

Hell, here's another (I guess?) point someone can use against me - why am I actively giving the opposition arguments to use against me? It's because I know exactly what you people are thinking and I'd like to see one or two of you actually arguing against me in a coherent and well founded fashion, even if it's wrong, I'd rather have you be wrong for the right reasons than correct for the wrong ones.

(+1)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH, I had to make an account just to reply to this. Im going to feed your replies into an AI and ask it to point out your own contradictions: 

Major Contradictions

1. Caring vs. Not Caring Claims "I don't actually care what any of you think" while simultaneously expressing desire to change people's behavior and "have some kind of positive impact on the world."

2. Wanting Feedback vs. Rejecting It Requests "coherent and well founded" arguments but then states "I don't actually care what you say."

3. Emotional State Denies being mad while explicitly acknowledging "harnessing my own frustrations" and aggressive behavior throughout.

4. Meaningfulness Calls their argument "stupid and fairly meaningless" while claiming "I've already won" and continuing to invest enormous effort into it.

5. Criticism of Name-Calling Criticizes the opponent for "calling everyone names" while extensively using insults like "lobotomite," "clown," and "not the brightest of the bunch."

6. Genuine Concern vs. Weaponized Advice Claims the autism suggestion is "genuine" concern while admitting to "harnessing my own frustrations" and using it within a barrage of insults.

7. Self-Awareness About Ego Admits to having a "sun-dwarfing ego" and claims to be self-aware, while simultaneously making grandiose supremacist statements throughout.

8. Time Investment Defends having "free time" for comments while acknowledging the "gambler's fallacy has set in" due to excessive investment—essentially admitting to the behavior they're defending against.

(6 edits)

Aside from not only being an AI bro, you're also apparently too incapable of actually thinking up your own arguments because your brain is too smooth. Please, keep using AI if you'd like, I can't really control that, but just know that you're using it as a replacement for having intelligent thought independent of what corporations want you to and it actively degrades your own life as a result. You could have a better life if you'd do some of the rational thinking on your own, but you don't, so you won't. (Note how it doesn't respond to any of my arguments about why AI is garbage? Yeah, that's for a couple reasons - but by using it and uploading the arguments to respond to me, it could be argued that you're just capitulating to what I've said about it being theft. You're incompetent and stupid, and even the technology is indirectly admitting to that by not touching it.)

Furthermore, I'm responding to your post to inform that I'm blocking you because I'm not going to continue risk engaging with the demon-technology. Please, feed this all into the Torment Nexus as you'd like, but I will not be having a hand in it any further than what I can control.

And for anyone that's stupid enough to continue to try using AI against me, I am measurably more wise than your machine. Intelligent, perhaps not, as (if we are using D&D terms) intellect is the depth of knowledge one can have, whereas wisdom is how intelligence is used. I am wise and able to communicate in a variety of ways on a variety of topics, whereas the machine is dependent on what has come before. The machine might beat me in chess or any number of small controlled environments, but it will never beat me in living my life.

To cap off this response, here's a relevant quote; "Humans set their own guidelines. This is not something machines can do. Reasoning depends on programming, not on hardware, and we are the ultimate program! Our Jihad is a "dump program". We dump the things which destroy us as humans!" - written by Frank Herbert in his book series, Dune

Also for more discussion on why I am going to continue annihilating your robotic anti-human machines, please watch Terminator or Terminator 2, read the previously mentioned Dune books, or engage with the sci-fi medium outside of any corporate robot trash that might be clouding your mind. Be a human, not a machine.

(2 edits)

It's also not lost on me that the only kind of response I've gotten up to this point is from one of the aforementioned AI-cultists that insists on using their machine-god to make them less weak. Almost like even the creator can't fully come up with a well-founded argument against me. (Or they just don't care to read paragraphs of me insulting them, but if they actually cared, they would go through the whole thing and argue against me.) And don't get me wrong, I'm not insulting anyone for not coming up with a response, I'm insulting people for not coming up with a response while using their own mind against me. You can't beat me, both on my and your terms. Almost like the whole argument for AI is bullshit, huh?

I have more respect for people that actually come up with even incorrect arguments if they're made by a human being. (And while my respect for it is not much, I feel the need to mention that it's still more than zero.) Again, this goes back to "I'd rather you be wrong for the right reasons than be right for the wrong ones," as I mentioned in a previous post.

And I'm going to continue blocking people that are using AI. At least think about the arguments you use if you're using AI to assist you in arguing against me - a little human intelligence is better than none. This is why I've not yet blocked the creator - even if they are using AI for writing or creation of their work, they're arguing against me themselves. A stupid person is still a person, whereas AI is less than nothing. (Also note that this is the main reason I'm not actually engaging with the AI-cultist's post - if someone else wants to use those points against me, they are free to, but any argument not altered by a human mind is not one I'm especially interested in engaging with. It's definitely something I can make plenty of points against, but I'm going to allow another rational and non-robotic being the chance to bring those points before me in a non-AI presented manner before I respond.)

Deleted 2 days ago

Who are you? What are you even talking about? 

What the actual fuck is happening in this thread? Are you all just lacking your entire brainstem? Is this a meme? Am I "being trolled"?

(3 edits)

Oh, I see what's happening - you're a completely unrelated developer that thought to go to my comments because it's the last thing I interacted with because I shit on your game.

Dude, go do something else, like making your game run better, what you are talking about is totally unrelated. Please keep on-topic with the thread or I'll just block and ignore you entirely.

You also don't know where I live, so you don't even know what kind of laws apply to me. Again, go do something else.

As a developer, you have a kind of duty to respond to comments and reviews in a sensible and non-psychotic fashion because generally, people like knowing that a developer that's creating a piece of software that might be a virus isn't insane. The actions that you have taken with this whole shebang are not what I would call "sensible" nor "non-psychotic", and this whole exchange just doubles my concerns about allowing your program on my computer whatsoever.

(Also I'm adding to my review that you did this, this was weird.)