It's also not lost on me that the only kind of response I've gotten up to this point is from one of the aforementioned AI-cultists that insists on using their machine-god to make them less weak. Almost like even the creator can't fully come up with a well-founded argument against me. (Or they just don't care to read paragraphs of me insulting them, but if they actually cared, they would go through the whole thing and argue against me.) And don't get me wrong, I'm not insulting anyone for not coming up with a response, I'm insulting people for not coming up with a response while using their own mind against me. You can't beat me, both on my and your terms. Almost like the whole argument for AI is bullshit, huh?
I have more respect for people that actually come up with even incorrect arguments if they're made by a human being. (And while my respect for it is not much, I feel the need to mention that it's still more than zero.) Again, this goes back to "I'd rather you be wrong for the right reasons than be right for the wrong ones," as I mentioned in a previous post.
And I'm going to continue blocking people that are using AI. At least think about the arguments you use if you're using AI to assist you in arguing against me - a little human intelligence is better than none. This is why I've not yet blocked the creator - even if they are using AI for writing or creation of their work, they're arguing against me themselves. A stupid person is still a person, whereas AI is less than nothing. (Also note that this is the main reason I'm not actually engaging with the AI-cultist's post - if someone else wants to use those points against me, they are free to, but any argument not altered by a human mind is not one I'm especially interested in engaging with. It's definitely something I can make plenty of points against, but I'm going to allow another rational and non-robotic being the chance to bring those points before me in a non-AI presented manner before I respond.)