A small part of me wonders if- because of my submission, and only getting 2 reviews, the effect of aggregation has caused a terrible offset where the remaining entries all are 'averaged down' and perhaps I got ONE gracious review that overly represented my project (which sort of doesn't 'fit' ) and in doing so 'breaking' the potential judging of the winner (AKA: if my project was leading but had only a fraction of the review base, it's an unfair representation.)
Also just wishful thinking that people were that kind to my entry!
More likely is the low overall number of reviews per project: 40 submissions and most projects have less than 10 reviews...