Not necessarily. There are two approaches courts take to interpretation: following “the letter of the law” and following the intent of the law.
When a law’s meaning is ambiguous, US judges tend to favor their understanding of what it should be. That means either the the judge’s opinion or a statement of legislators’ intent— like that expressed in the GOP’s horrendous Project 2025— is used for the ruling.
We can see examples of this in recent Supreme Court statements.
With what has happened to the judicial and executive branches of the federal governmemt and various parts of state governments, any Republican-led bill should not be accepted at face value.
The party’s motives matter for federal legislation.