Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

Your being quite glib. I get it, you do 2d games, and you have a hang-up about AI code used in games, but I seriously doupt you could ask AI to generate a game faster than someone can post it. AI can help a devloper yes.. A mean's to an end. But only to a certain point. Everything else that deveolper contributes to their project AI cannot take into account a developer's skills in 3d software such as Blender, or even using Gimp to create texture's or enhance them, or even using Audacity to create or ajust sound files to work with thier project. 

"It is also an issue if you are fed answers from other people, or copy and paste all the time... when faced with an actual problem you will fall apart." Are you serious?? how do you assume my mental tolerence as to when my mental ability's fall apart.

"I don't necessarily have to be good at a thing to say that you are bad at it. Keep it real, you made statements that directly show your disinterest in learning" 

I don't think I posted the word "duh..." and when did you judge me as someone who was disinterested in learning? And if you thought that that from my post, you clearly saw an oppurtunity to pounce on me for having the basic skill's ti learn or improve on the things I see or what I can read.

This is the game I am creating. 

If you truly think you could ask AI to make it for you and never play my version of it, then that's your choice. I doupt Ai can do it just cause you ask it to,  becuase it requires skills in 3d modelling, audio and sound production, the basic Idea's and conception to make it work. That's a very alpha of what I am doing and obviously need's a billion rework's, but do not ever think that I am some hack with low intelligence and unable to learn new things. I created that almost 99% of it with some help. Either from friends or AI for code.

(+1)

I'm sorry, I don't see any point in continuing here, you are misunderstanding everything, replying to ideas that were never put forth. I say "What if XYZ" and you reply with "Do you really believe that XYZ?" The whole point of a hypothetical is to explore something that isn't true, so your question is totally absurd.

Well... if a discussion cannot be agreed upon two parties...  Then both parties could extend an olive branch and agree, to simply disagree. right?

BUT instead you decided to get that last word in, or last statement in..  "so your question is totally absurd.",  And if you thought it was absurb in the first place, then why did you respond? when you could have simply moved on to another forum post to read and post in?

So I will post my reason for letting this conversation between us end, because we both cannot agree on different points of view regarding any benifits of using AI as a resource for making games.

I extend my olive branch of saying "Let's just agree, to disagree!".

=)

Haha, no way, I don't do the "agree to disagree" thing, I actually enjoy debating and I don't get offended when people challenge my ideas. However it is not possible to have a debate with you if you are just going to reinvent what I say. 

I said:
What happens when the AI does become extensive enough that you can just say "make me a game"?

And you replied with:
If you truly think you could ask AI to make it for you and never play my version of it, then that's your choice. 

What? How did you go from "What if" to "Well if you truly believe that"? People say "what if" about things that aren't true. So if you come back with "well if you think that's true", you are just not understanding the point of a hypothetical. So no, this isn't 'agree to disagree' - you are wrong in treating my hypothetical as something that I believe is true now (literally the opposite of a hypothetical). This makes your response objectively irrelevant, and you can either revise your argument based on what I actually said, or not do so and continue speaking to phantoms.

Have you ever seen the Original WIlly Wonka movie with Gene Wilder...? and the Everlasting Gobstopper? just a candy you can pop in your mouth, and it's sweet.. just plain sugary... but it never shrinks in size, forever remains the same candy... all that sugar.. not good for you over time...

have you ever watched Monty Python from the early day's? was a show we got here in canada back in the 60's and 70's and so on because someone from britain came over here on a boat and got drunk and fought a moose and won... Then he planted a british flag in the dirt and we became part of the commonwealth.... well, the best part of being conquered after Moose Day ( every June 7th ) is that we got to watch british tv show's. This Monty Python skit still makes me chuckle.. 

In this skit... I am John Cleese and you are Micheal Palin. And if you wish to keep arguing, I will need another dollar.

You've really gone off. Again, I said I can't argue with your nonsense. And you reply "if you want to keep arguing..."

Uh... I only responded because you replied... So i replied with a response... but  now you reply with "You've really gone off. Again, I said I can't argue with your nonsense. And you reply "if you want to keep arguing..." So.. if you cannot argue with my nonsense.. then why keep replying? Is it because you feel the need to keep this discussion going? or  the need to have the last word in?

You also said "Haha, no way, I don't do the "agree to disagree" thing, I actually enjoy debating and I don't get offended when people challenge my ideas. However it is not possible to have a debate with you if you are just going to reinvent what I say. " So...  if you really want this discussion to end, but enjoy the debating, well that's contradiction.. So i do not know where you stand on this issue. But I do thank you for the time you took to respond. I hope my question posted did not take to much time away from your own time from thing's you want to do. So in the end, I hope you have a wonderful day, and understand that even If I do not agree with your point of view, I can understand it.

Also, if you post any final response, I will not reply to it. You can have the last word in. =)

Lol, pure comedy. You can't possibly understand my point of view if you aren't able to read and comprehend my sentences. If I say I like debating, and then you assume that I want the debate to end, you are just not able to communicate, let alone discuss.