Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+31)(-2)

Nobody’s arguing that rape or mutilation are good things. The point is that fiction, even dark and uncomfortable fiction, exists to explore extremes, not to promote them. Just like watching a war film doesn’t make you a war criminal, playing a game with taboo content doesn’t mean you’re about to commit a crime. Shockingly, people are capable of separating fantasy from reality. Who knew?

What’s really worrying is that payment processors are acting like the new moral police, cutting off support to anything that doesn’t fit their blurry definition of acceptable. So who gets to decide what counts as oppressive or too offensive? Is it just whatever makes a PR guy nervous that day?

If a company doesn’t want to be associated with certain content, fine. But at least be consistent, be clear, and stop pretending it’s about protecting people. It’s not. It’s about brand image and control, and that’s a much bigger problem than any piece of messed-up fiction.

Expecting godd sense from a private company... delusional. its going for the most profit and right now its thins moral campaing, They dont give a fuck about right or wrongs. They go for the most profitble momentarly action. In a few months nothing they are doing now will stand.

I understand your point, opression can come in a viriety of ways, and sanction everything reletable with violence would be te most consistant way to act but it is a private company looking for profit. Endosing the moral of the powerful group of the moment is the most profitble action.