Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+5)

That's a law made by republicans (the same that are very very much happy with these results, and with considering all porn illegal), only meant to make debanking of nazis impossible.

If you want to REALLY make a difference check the SAFE SEX workers act.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/09/fight-overturn-fosta-unconstitutional-internet-censorship-law-continues

https://reason.com/2024/12/18/the-safe-sex-workers-study-act-a-bill-aimed-at-ultimately-repealing-fosta-is-back/

Your idea of "really make a difference" is a measure that your own linked article calls "mostly symbolic"?

The Fair Access to Banking Act is a bill with neutral language that addresses a nonpartisan issue. The same language that protects """nazis""" also protects everyone else. That's about as good as you can ask for.

(1 edit)

That "neutral" language is a copy paste of all the other dozens of times they tried to shred the right of people to not do business with white supremacists (which as you may know, in freedum land aren't illegal). And as further reading my links would tell you, it would make no difference at all for lewd games because such kind of bigots  *already* considers NSFW illegal.

SESTA-FOSTA is why payment processors have been all the kind of "fussy" in the last few years. Like think to it: why would banking guys be rejecting your fresh delicious money? And if you are wild guess is even "something ideological something", why in the heaven would you be now trusting of the most shameless vile Talibangelicals?