I have issues with this, but identifying personal opinion from the objective is a hard thing to do. I will give you this, I watched the F1 movie last night and this was more memorable than that. When it comes to my thoughts on story criticism I usually just let my nuts hang but this story has a particular audience that is pretty separate from me, so I won't. It would be like bringing a Lana Del Ray fan to a Yeat concert and having them give a review.
I will start with my compliments. The story is contained and I love that. Short stories are best when revolving around a single place and/or stretch of time so it's good to see that. Additionally the subject of AI and its use by people to substitute real-life connections I think was handled well. The fact that the story's main subject is a very relevant issue in modern society makes this even better.
There is only one piece of advice I feel I can give without it being opinionated. You should slow down on the profanities. I think I read "fuck" like every six lines. Frustration and an overall poor mental state does not require cursing and in a story cursing can either be a hindrance or a powerful thing. With so much of it (and this is what I mean by blurring the lines of opinion and objective) the story bogs itself down whereas if she only used such words in critical moments, the use of that vernacular is given weight.
Lastly, the idea of a federal employee sitting behind a computer screen half asleep at 2am getting someone to masturbate as a job is pretty funny.
This wasn't for me, regardless I hope you continue to write and create. Best of luck with your future projects I wish you well.