Post by Sober in LINC comments

Viewing post in LINC comments

Yeah exactly

Thanks for the feedback.

Happy you liked the art/aesthetics.

In terms of gameplay, do you mean you would have liked to see a system with more interacting components?
As in, more things which could influence how quickly you can generate contributions?

Sober95 days ago(+1)

Yeah exactly,
Generally we either have great games with a lack of QOL/Art or the opposite (in this case)

Nothing to say about QOL & Art, your style is amazing, keep it!

Compared to other incremental, more upgrades, a tree upgrade (or some kind) new type of currency, maybe slow down the general passing but create more interactions, things to do to reach that ultimate end goal,

The game at this point is pretty much playable almost automatically, you just take no decision, upgrade whatever you want, at the end mathematically you finish it.

I think it's more about a whole work on the purpose of the game, also incrementals with good art have a GREAT success on steam, so I'm sure with A LOT more content you would be able to make this a banger :)

If you need any help or need someone to find you ideas of content, let me know :)

byra94 days ago(+1)

Thanks for the detailed answer. That helps out a lot!

The lack of strategic decisions is definitely something I felt while playtesting as well. In a way, the game is somewhat on rails. I'll think a bit of how I could add more actual decisions into the game.

itch.io

Viewing post in LINC comments