[Reuse questions. Very short summary: how to attribute if the law demands attribution and is skeptical towards pseudonyms; how to use if the author may forbid interference on his works?]
Preface
I don't know if you can help me, but I will try.
While the font is licensed, I have two problems. They have to do with the author's "moral rights". Namely, author may have an attribution right and a right to prohibit certain modifications, which isn't destroyed by the license. So I have 5 questions.
The post
Important note: simple "yes" to a question means acceptance as written here, with the same terms, excluding situations where it's clearly seen that the written text wasn't accepted.
Firstly, in my country attribution right can't be waived. And courts often count pseudonymous usage as "invalid attribution", making the reuser liable. That's because people have real names, and not only pseudonyms...
With regard to it, I have 3 questions:
1. Is the real name of the author kept in secret or undisclosed by the author? Can I use in while attributing, or not?
2. Is
"Шрифт: автором является GGBotNet, https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode.en , название работы и источник - https://ggbot.itch.io/jupiteroid-font , приспособлено под данный документ, но не изменено." (in Russian)
valid and sufficient attribution information, including for any amount of usage (infinitely many works, maybe created in different situations and for different usage) and for perpetual period of time, where hyperlinks may be presented as a simple text, not actually linking to somewhere, or may be presented as hyperlinks, at my own discretion.
The translation (IT WILL NOT BE ACTUALLY USED, I WILL ACTUALLY USE THE RUSSIAN ATTRIBUTION TEXT) is "Font: the author is GGBotNet, https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode.en , the name of the work and the source of the work is https://ggbot.itch.io/jupiteroid-font, adapted for this document, but not changed.".
3. Specifially, do you agree with PSEUDONYMOUS attribution to you for any amount of usage (infinitely many works, maybe created in different situations and for different public usage) and for perpetual period of time?
Secondly, author may have a right to prohibit certain actions (changes, interferences) with his/her work without his/her permission separately from the rights owner.
(See part *, it is moved.)
1. Are all these actions allowed in general to do with the font, and without violation of the moral right of the author that prohibits interference, for all use cases?
2. If not or this is not possible by law, can the actions mentioned below be allowed in my case (all types of aforementioned modifications). Here is it:
[I want]
What to do: to create documents with text or any other content (defined as work in law), and to use it at home, at/for an educational institution (including not only learning, but also a labour relationship with the educational instituation), to any person, legal or physical, i will work for, including standard work, situations where the contract was for one-time or non-regular work or when services were given by me for monetary compensation even in the event of contract absense, or any other situations which are similar to "work" in nature, defined as broadly as possible.
Time: the actions will be allowed for perpetual period of time.
Quantity of usage: the actions will be allowed for any amount of usage (infinitely many works, maybe created in different situations and for different usage).
BONUS QUESTIONS.
Bonus question 1. If the font is licensed via the same license, but is not this font, is it possible to apply the answer to the another font? Why did I ask the questions: because there are others similarly licensed fonts (this includes only the same license), and these questions are important for these fonts too.
Bonus question 2. Can I save the page for a proof?
Bonus question 3. And can I translate this, including with publication here or without a publication, for a proof?
Thank you, if you could help me somehow. I simply want to decrease the risks of liablity to the further extent possible. Again, thanks.
(Part *):
These actions primarily include any interference with the work, any influence on the work, but interference is being understood in a very general sense, as anything that, a little or a lot, changes the work or interferes with the work, regardless of the result, and also as a change of things that are "around" a work, "near" a work, because this also influences the work perception and may violate the right of author to communicate his idea. It is understood that any "change" is "interference", therefore.
Interference includes also, for example, any addition and subtraction of any Content if it was done with regards to a certain work; certain other things. Any interference always result in a change to the work in a broadest meaning possible (examples: addition, substraction, other things), and a change to the work is always considered interference, though interference is not required to be disruptive to be prohibited without author's consent. Content here is defined very broadly: it may not be part of the work, content here may not be authored by interfering person, and content here may even be "around" a work, "near" a work (not only inside a work). A Preface to this post is also to be example of Content with regards to the post as work, including any analogies this may arise, should similar information in the broadest sense be placed at any place of the work (Preface placed at any place of the work), it's nonetheless will become Content, even if it is not named "Preface", but by the nature of copyright law it's similar information, or is a version of a preface placed in a certain place that is not standard for a preface. Should any doubts arise about any text, if it is Content or not, it will be Content.
These paragraphs (paragraphs from the part *) to the further extent possible must be thought of in terms of civil law of Russia, and must to the further extent possible suggest an authors' moral right, and they are to be interpreted in a way that all applicable permissions for normal reuse of the work are to be given to the reuser should the author agree to it, and the reuser will be non-infringing, should the author agree to these terms.